Abstract:The product quality, productivity, and cost are mainly considered to make the manufacturing plan in plastic injection molding (PIM). The process parameters in PIM play a crucial role in determining the product quality, productivity, and cost. There are actually contradictions between above three properties. Therefore, it is difficult to quickly and accurately obtain the process parameters setting that meet the product quality requirement under the premise of acceptable productivity and cost. In this paper, a differential sensitivity fusion method (DSFM) is proposed to perform the multi-objective optimization of process parameters in PIM for the product quality and productivity improvement and the cost-saving, which integrates sampling strategy, numerical simulation, metamodeling method, and multi-objective optimization algorithm. The sampling strategy is utilized to generate sampling points from the design space at different parameter levels. For the sampling points, the numerical simulation is implemented to calculate the objective responses. Based on the sampling points and their corresponding response, the metamodeling method is applied to construct the response predictors to calculate the objective responses for any sampling point in the global design space. The multi-objective optimization algorithm is executed to locate the Pareto-optimal solutions, where the response predictors are taken as the fitness functions. The automobile front bumper is taken as the case study to verify the proposed method. The numerical results demonstrate that the proposed metamodeling method has better prediction accuracy and performance compared to some classical methods (e.g., response surface model, Kriging) and the multiple objectives cannot reach the optimal simultaneously. Moreover, the trade-off analysis identifies the better solution for decision-making, which helps to quickly and effectively select the optimal process parameters setting.

Quality Defect Analysis of Injection Molding Based on Gradient Enhanced Kriging Model

Process Control of Injection Molding Based on Multiscale Visualization Methodology - A Case Study

Multi-objective Robust Optimization of Injection Molding Process Parameters Based on TOPSIS

A Closed-Loop Multivariable Quality Control Scheme for Injection Molding Process

Multiobjective optimization of injection molding parameters based on the GEK-MPDE method

Quality Control Via Simplex Search-Based Model Free Optimization for Injection Molding

Online quality optimization of the injection molding process via digital image processing and model-free optimization

Quality and Defect Prediction in Plastic Injection Molding using Machine Learning Algorithms based Gating Systems and Its Mathematical Models

Process Parameters Optimization Using a Novel Classification Model for Plastic Injection Molding

Multiobjective Optimization Method for Polymer Injection Molding Based on a Genetic Algorithm

Design plan evaluation of precision injection molding machine based on satisfaction

A Statistical Quality Monitoring Method for Plastic Injection Molding Using Machine Built-in Sensors

Multi-objective optimization of injection-molded plastic parts using entropy weight, random forest, and genetic algorithm methods

Product Quality Improvement Method In Manufacturing Process Based On Kernel Optimisation Algorithm

Part weight control via model free optimization for injection molding

Multi-objective optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding using a differential sensitivity fusion method

A method combining optimization algorithm and inverse-deformation design for improving the injection quality of box-shaped parts

A real-time process optimization system for injection molding

Process Parameters Optimization of Injection Molding Using a Fast Strip Analysis As a Surrogate Model

Multi-objective Optimization Method of Injection Molding Process Parameters Based on Hierarchical Sampling and Comprehensive Entropy Weights

Intelligent injection molding: Parameters self‐learning optimization using iterative gradient‐approximation adaptive method