Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Imatinib in Primary Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Jiayu Ling,Lishuo Shi,Xingyu Cheng,Yang Fu,Ziqin Lin,Yandong Zhao,Zheqing Li,Jianwei Zhang,Huabin Hu,Yue Cai,Yanhong Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-931
2023-01-01
Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Abstract:Background:The effect of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) with imatinib versus upfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant therapy (AT) with imatinib on the outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is unknown.Methods:This is a retrospective study at a high-volume center. All the patients with primary localized GIST were identified in a hospital database from 2007 to 2021. The endpoints included local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distance recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression was used to perform multivariate survival analyses. The sensitivity analysis was conducted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.Results:A total of 211 patients were included (Group A: UR + AT, n=140; Group B: NAT + resection + AT, n=71). In the entire cohort, 5-year DRFS, LRFS, and OS were 85.6%, 90.7%, and 92.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, better DRFS was linked to NAT, tumor size of 5 cm, and AT. Sixteen patients (11.4%) in Group A and 1 (1.4%) in Group B had distant recurrences after AT discontinuation. The sensitivity analysis by IPTW provided approximately similar results. An interaction effect was observed between NAT and tumor location on DRFS. In non-gastric GISTs, NAT was associated with better DRFS [hazard ratio =0.131, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.017-0.989, P=0.049], which was not the case in gastric GIST (P=0.08). NAT was not independently associated with LRFS or OS.Conclusions:When compared to UR + AT, NAT + resection + AT may reduce the risk of distant recurrence in localized GIST and may be especially beneficial for patients with non-gastric GISTs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?