Impact of Property Rights Reform to Support China's Rural-Urban Integration: Household-Level Evidence from the Chengdu National Experiment
Klaus Deininger,Songqing Jin,Shouying Liu,Fang Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12306
2019-01-01
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Abstract:As part of a national experiment, Chengdu prefecture implemented, in 2008, ambitious property rights reforms including complete registration of all land, easier transferability, and elimination of migration restrictions. A triple difference approach using the Statistics Bureau’s regular household panel suggests reforms increased consumption and income, especially for less wealthy and less educated households, with estimated benefits well above the cost of implementation. Local labor supply increased with the young shifting towards agriculture and the old towards off-farm employment. Agricultural yields, intensity of input use, and diversity of output also increased. Improving property rights in peri-urban China appears to have increased investment and diversification. 1. Motivation and background Between 2000 and 2010, urban land use in China expanded enormously at rates that are among the highest in East Asia. Institutional arrangements, in particular the fact that local governments are able to generate enormous revenue by expropriating land cheaply from farmers and selling it to developers at prices that are many orders of magnitude higher are one of the main factors underlying this phenomenon. The fact that land was often not used productively has been a source of bad loans, rural unrest and, in light of China’s limited endowment of fertile agricultural land, is also viewed as affecting food security. Cognizant of the challenges faced by this situation, a number of national experiments were conducted to explore the scope for alternative and potentially more sustainable arrangements. But to bring about change, simultaneous action in a number of areas is needed. Chengdu’s 2008 effort at rural-urban integration is particularly relevant as it involved systematic verification of all types of land assets, relaxation of the restrictions imposed by the hukou system of urban residency permits, and measures to improve land market functioning. This would be expected to create jobs and enhance economic performance via higher investment due to higher tenure security and greater allocative efficiency, particularly for land and labor, due to market-based reallocation. At the same time, there is concern that far-reaching reforms in this area would be overly costly, give rise to disputes, or socially undesirable land transfers and migration. With concerns about land issues undermining the scope for future economic growth and property rights having been explicitly identified as a priority area for reform by China’s leadership, assessing the impacts of past measures will be important to inform future policy and potentially design of specific experiments. Yet, beyond anecdotal accounts, there is no rigorous quantitative assessment to assess either the magnitude of associated impacts or their incidence among different types of households. To provide such an assessment, we use the fact that the reform was only implemented in Chengdu prefecture, leaving neighboring counties unaffected. Panel data from NBS’ regular rural household survey