Analysis of Breast Follow-Up Results in Patients after Polyacrylamide Hydrogel (PAAG) or Silicone Prosthesis Removal.

Haiting Zou,Ran Mo,Shuqin Wang,Xin Yan,Yue Lin,Qian Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.11.063
IF: 3.022
2022-01-01
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Abstract:Background: Polyacrylamide hydrogel has been prohibited since 2006 due to numer-ous complications. Unsatisfactory breast contour was always observed in patients after PAAG removal. The same occurred in patients after silicone prosthesis removal. We attempt to com-pare and analyze the difference in postoperative breast conditions and pathology between the two groups. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent PAAG or silicone prosthesis removal between 2011 and 2021. The BREAST-Q was used to evaluate the follow-up results, including satisfaction with breasts, physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and the operation. Results: A total of 63 patients were analyzed. The PAAG group complained of more lumps or indurations ( p = 0.004), benefited less from operations as for symptomatic relief ( p = 0.002), and had more chronic inflammation(p = 0.000) than the silicone group. No breast cancer was found. All the Breast-Q scores were lower in the PAAG group than in the silicone group, and there was a significant difference in satisfaction with physical well-being ( p = 0.035). Besides, patients without symptoms tended to score higher in all aspects of Breast-Q than patients with symptoms after removal. The two groups (symptom & no symptom) differed in psychosocial well-being ( p = 0.043) and satisfaction with operation ( p = 0.048). Conclusions: The breast contour of patients after PAAG or silicone prosthesis removal was worse than before. Early removal of PAAG before complications arise may result in a better surgical benefit. There is no doubt that PAAG are harmful both physically and psychologically. All patients are suggested to have PAAG injections removed.(c) 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Pub-lished by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
What problem does this paper attempt to address?