Abstract:Given the scale of today's distributed storage systems, the failure of an individual node is a common phenomenon. Various metrics have been proposed to measure the efficacy of the repair of a failed node, such as the amount of data download needed to repair (also known as the repair bandwidth), the amount of data accessed at the helper nodes, and the number of helper nodes contacted. Clearly, the amount of data accessed can never be smaller than the repair bandwidth. In the case of a help-by-transfer code, the amount of data accessed is equal to the repair bandwidth. It follows that a help-by-transfer code possessing optimal repair bandwidth is access optimal. The focus of the present paper is on help-by-transfer codes that employ minimum possible bandwidth to repair the systematic nodes and are thus access optimal for the repair of a systematic node. The zigzag construction by Tamo et al. in which both systematic and parity nodes are repaired is access optimal. But the sub-packetization level required is $r^k$ where $r$ is the number of parities and $k$ is the number of systematic nodes. To date, the best known achievable sub-packetization level for access-optimal codes is $r^{k/r}$ in a MISER-code-based construction by Cadambe et al. in which only the systematic nodes are repaired and where the location of symbols transmitted by a helper node depends only on the failed node and is the same for all helper nodes. Under this set-up, it turns out that this sub-packetization level cannot be improved upon. In the present paper, we present an alternate construction under the same setup, of an access-optimal code repairing systematic nodes, that is inspired by the zigzag code construction and that also achieves a sub-packetization level of $r^{k/r}$.

New Piggybacking Codes with Lower Repair Bandwidth for Any Single-Node Failure.

Toward Lower Repair Bandwidth of Piggybacking Codes via Jointly Design for Both Data and Parity Nodes

Two Piggybacking Codes with Flexible Sub-Packetization to Achieve Lower Repair Bandwidth

Two New Piggybacking Designs with Lower Repair Bandwidth

Piggybacking+ Codes: MDS Array Codes with Linear Sub- Packetization to Achieve Lower Repair Bandwidth.

Piggybacking plus Codes: MDS Array Codes with Linear Sub-Packetization to Achieve Lower Repair Bandwidth

Toward Lower Repair Bandwidth and Optimal Repair Complexity of Piggybacking Codes with Small Sub-packetization

An Efficient Piggybacking Design with Lower Repair Bandwidth and Lower Sub-packetization.

A new repair-efficient piggybacking design for systematic nodes

Generalized piggybacking codes for distributed storage systems

A Sytematic Piggybacking Design for Minimum Storage Regenerating Codes

A Piggybacking Design Framework for Read-and Download-efficient Distributed Storage Codes

Bidirectional Piggybacking Design for All Nodes With Sub-Packetization 2 ≤ l ≤ r

An Alternate Construction of an Access-Optimal Regenerating Code with Optimal Sub-Packetization Level

Cascade Codes For Distributed Storage Systems

Code Constructions for Distributed Storage With Low Repair Bandwidth and Low Repair Complexity

Rack-Aware Regenerating Codes with Fewer Helper Racks

PMDS Array Codes With Small Sub-packetization, Small Repair Bandwidth/Rebuilding Access

General Sub-packetized Access-Optimal Regenerating Codes

LDPC Code Design for Distributed Storage: Balancing Repair Bandwidth, Reliability and Storage Overhead

A New Zigzag-Decodable Code with Efficient Repair in Wireless Distributed Storage