Antisaccades and Its Experimental Paradigm,Mechanisms and Influencing Factors
Zhou Lin,Deng Zhu,Chen Qingrong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2012.01.006
2012-01-01
Abstract:The antisaccades task is the main method to study endogenous saccades. In 1978 Hallett used the task in his study for the first time. The task was developed from the standard prosaccade task. In the task the participants fixated a central stimulus replaced by a sudden onset target that appeared at some distance to the left or right. The participants were told to refrain from looking at the peripheral target and direct their gaze instead in the opposite direction. The subjects were to inhibit the saccade towards the peripheral target, and direct their gaze in the opposite direction. There were three paradigms: the gap paradigm, the overlap paradigm, and the null paradigm. This task could provide many metrics, such as saccade latency, error rate, and time to correct error saccade. In order to find the different effects of endogenous and exogenous factors on the saccades, many studies contrasted antisaccades with prosaccades. Compared with prosaccades, antisaccades tended to have higher response latencies and error rates, but saccade errors could be corrected very quickly, much faster than the latency of prosaccade. To perform a correct antisaccade, the participants were to inhibit a reflexive prosaccade to the sudden onset target and initiate an alternative antisaccade to the opposite direction, and the plan of prosaccades and antisaccades could be programmed in parallel and be competitive. If the antisaccades system reached the threshold fast enough, the correct antisaccade was initiated and the reflexive prosaccade was canceled. But, if the endogenous processes failed to inhibit the activation of the prosaccades system and canceled the prosaccades program, an erroneous prosaccade toward the target was made, and the correct antisaccade followed. Evidence suggests that antisaccades can be influenced by many factors. Firstly, the "gap effect" is an important phenomenon in the antisaccades task. If there is a short gap before the target appears, the saccades tend to be faster than otherwise. These speeded saccades are thought to indicate that a tendency to keep the eye on the currently fixated stimulus. Secondly, the distance between the central fixation and peripheral target can affect the latency and error rate of antisaccades. This effect has something to do with the structure of retina. Thirdly, many studies suggest that working memory has something to do with the generation of antisaccades. Working memory plays an important role in inhibiting reflexive response, and helps to inhibit the prosaccades and initiate the antisaccades. Fourthly, the ability to perform antisaccades is not constant across the lifespan, and broadly consistent with the development of the prefrontal cortex. The decline in the antisaccade of old participants might be directly due to the decrease of working memory capacity induced by cognitive aging. The antisaccades task provides an efficient method for the study of behavioral control and attention, but still a lot of questions need to be discussed.