Abstract:Background: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is indicated for skeletally immature patients with progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who have failed or are intolerant of bracing and who have a major coronal curve of 40° to 65°. The vertebral body must be structurally and dimensionally adequate to accommodate screw fixation, as determined radiographically. The best indication for VBT is a flexible single major thoracic curve with nonstructural compensating lumbar and proximal thoracic curves (Lenke 1A or 1B). VBT allows for progressive correction of the deformity without spinal fusion by utilizing a minimally invasive fluoroscopic technique. Description: The procedure for a right thoracic curve is performed with use of a right thoracoscopic approach with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. The thoracoscope is introduced through a portal at the apex of the curvature in the posterior axillary line. Instrument portals are created lateral to each vertebral body in the mid-axillary line. Screws are inserted into each vertebral body under biplanar fluoroscopic control and with intraoperative neuromonitoring. An electroconductivity probing device, while not mandatory, is routinely utilized at our practice. The tether is attached to the most proximal screw of the construct, and then reduction is obtained sequentially by tensioning the tether from one vertebral screw to the next. Alternatives: Bracing is the gold-standard treatment for progressive AIS involving the immature spine. The most commonly utilized surgical treatment is posterior spinal fusion (PSF), which should be considered when the major coronal curve exceeds 45°. Rationale: PSF has proven to be a dependable technique to correct scoliotic deformities. It has a low complication rate and good long-term outcomes. However, concerns exist regarding the stiffness conferred by PSF and the long-term effects of adjacent segment disease. Thus, interest had developed in non-fusion solutions for AIS correction. VBT utilizes the Hueter-Volkmann principle to guide growth and correct deformity. Compressive forces applied to the convexity of the deformity by a polyethylene tether allow the patient's growth to realign the spine. Intraoperative correction triggers growth modulation, and most of the modulation seems to occur during the first 12 months postoperatively. The best results have been seen with a short Lenke type-1A curve in a patient with closed triradiate cartilage, a Risser 3 or lower (ideally Risser 0) iliac apophysis, and a flexible curve characterized by a 50% reduction of the major coronal curve angle on side-bending radiographs. Expected outcomes: In 57 immature patients with a Lenke type-1A or 1B curve (i.e., a 30° to 65° preoperative Cobb angle), Samdani et al.3 found a main thoracic Cobb angle reduction from 40° ± 7° preoperatively to 19° ± 13° at 2 years after VBT. In the sagittal plane, the T5-T12 kyphosis measured 15° ± 10° preoperatively, 17° ± 10° postoperatively, and 20° ± 13° at 2 years. No major neurologic or pulmonary complications occurred. A total of 7 (12.3%) of the 57 patients underwent surgical revision, including 5 for overcorrection and 2 to span additional vertebrae. In a study of 21 skeletally mature patients, Pehlivanoglu et al.4 found that the Cobb angle was reduced from 48° preoperatively to 16° on the first-erect postoperative radiograph and finally to 10° at the latest follow-up (mean, 27.4 months). The 2 main complications of VBT reported in the literature are overcorrection and tether breakage. Both may require revision, which explains the higher rate of revision observed for VBT compared with PSF. Important tips: Good patient selection is important. VBT is most appropriate in cases of a flexible Lenke type-1A or 1B curve in an immature child before Risser stage 3 and after triradiate cartilage closure.Always monitor and control screw positioning in both anteroposterior and lateral planes fluoroscopically.The screws should be placed parallel to the vertebral end plates or, even better, be angled inferiorly for the upper vertebrae and angled superiorly for the lower vertebrae to decrease the risk of pull-out when tensioning the device and during growth modulation. Less tension on the uppermost and lowermost instrumented vertebrae than at the apex, as controlled by the tensioning device, can also help to limit pull-out. Acronyms and abbreviations: VBT = vertebral body tetheringAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosisIONM = intraoperative neuromonitoringPSF = posterior spinal fusionUIV = upper instrumented vertebraLIV = lower instrumented vertebraAP = anteroposteriorK-wire = Kirschner wire.

Radiological Outcomes of Re-tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 2-to-5-year Follow-Up Case Series After Index Vertebral Body Tethering Failure

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Single-Center Cohort with 4.3 to 7.4 Years of Follow-up

Early-term outcome of apical fusion with vertebral body tethering for thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study

Vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review

The Fate of The Broken Tether: How Do Curves Treated with Vertebral Body Tethering Behave After Tether Breakage?

The efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in lenke type 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Lumbar Vertebral Body Tethering

Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct

Incidence of Tether Breakage in Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering

Radiographic and perioperative outcomes following anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering: a pilot series

Posterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Preliminary Study of a New Technique to Correct Lenke 5C Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Anterior vertebral tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: our initial ten year clinical experience

A New Look at Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT): Through the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink (mCDS) Classification

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Review of the Available Evidence

54. Perioperative outcomes of anterior vertebral spinal tethering vs posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Thoracoscopic Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering in Lenke Type-1 Right Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Associations of overweight status with spinal curve correction and complications in patients undergoing vertebral body tethering: a multicenter retrospective review

Chest tube management following two row vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Results of posterior spinal fusion after failed anterior vertebral body tethering

Analysis of three-dimensional spine growth for vertebral body tethering patients at 2 and 5 years post operatively