Abstract:One of the most puzzling findings in decision research field is the disjunction effect. Several studies demonstrate that the disjunction effect exists in a two-person prisoner's dilemma game. This effect violates the sure-thing principle and cannot be explained by classical decision-making models. During the recent decade, quantum decision making models have been established on the basis of the mathematical structure and methodologies of quantum mechanics. Owing to their special theoretical structures, quantum decision-making models are well suited for explaining the disjunction effect, although these models continue to encounter difficulties.This study aims to overcome the difficulties in existing quantum decision-making models by developing a modified model. To achieve this goal, the deficiencies of the previous models were analyzed. We concluded three deficiencies: 1) Although previous quantum decision-making models can account for the disjunction effect, they can also obtain findings that defy the experimental results and common sense. 2) They cannot explain the disjunction effect with large values in certain experiments (e.g., the experiment of Shafir & Tversky, 1992). 3) They cannot properly illustrate the relationship between the utility of decision maker's pay off and the scale of the disjunction effect.The reasons for these difficulties were investigated. An important reason is that previous quantum decision-making models ignore that the decision maker may consider another's pay off based on different decision conditions. Another reason is the over-simplicity of the utility function. With the above analyses as basis, we adopted the equate-to-differentiate method to rebuild the quantum decision-making model. In this new model, whether the decision maker considers another's pay off or not based on a specific decision condition is determined with the equate-to-differentiate method. In addition, the utility function is redefined by value function and hyperbolic tangent transformation.Results revealed that the new quantum decision-making model overcomes the difficulties in previous quantum decision-making models. The proposed model is an integration of heuristic and computational or mathematical models. This ideal model integration deserves much attention and has good theoretical significance and application prospects.

Inferable Dynamic Markov Model to Predict Interference Effects.

Dynamical Markov decision-making model based on mass function to quantitatively predict interference effects.

Fuzzy Markov Decision-Making Model for Interference Effects

A New Method to Predict the Interference Effect in Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks

A Quantum Dynamic Belief Decision Making Model.

A quantum dynamic belief model to explain the interference effects of categorization on decision making

An Evidential Dynamical Model to Predict the Interference Effect of Categorization on Decision Making Results

Information Processing by Networks of Quantum Decision Makers

A Subjective Model of Human Decision Making Based on Quantum Decision Theory

A model of adaptive decision making from representation of information environment by quantum fields

An Evidential Markov Decision Making Model

A Quantifiable Risky Decision Model: Incorporating Individual Memory into Informational Cascade

A More Realistic Markov Process Model for Explaining the Disjunction Effect in One-Shot Prisoner's Dilemma Game

A Quantum-Like Information Processing Model with Memory Noise for Question Order Effect

Dynamic noise estimation: A generalized method for modeling noise fluctuations in decision-making

Quantum Decision-Making Model Based On Equate-To-Differentiate Method: Explanation For The Disjunction Effect In Prisoner'S Dilemma

Analyzing dynamic decision-making models using Chapman-Kolmogorov equations

A Negation Quantum Decision Model to Predict the Interference Effect in Categorization.

A multi-stage anticipated surprise model with dynamic expectation for economic decision-making

Interference Effects in Quantum Belief Networks