Abstract:This article refines the analysis of interest-bearing capital and debt in Marx's circuit of capital, incorporating Kōzō Uno's critique for a more precise depiction. It reassesses Marx's model of interest-bearing capital () and Uno's distinction between creditor and debtor roles, proposing an advanced model that highlights the role of financial instruments () and debt (). The form of money-lending capital for the creditor is articulated as , where represents the issuance of a loan and the collection of debt. On the other hand, the form of merchant capital with debt for the debtor is depicted as , incorporating both the borrowing () and repayment () processes within the form of merchant capital. This approach not only clarifies the transactions between creditors and debtors but also builds upon Uno's theoretical contributions, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding the dynamics of interest-bearing capital and the movement of capital with debt. The revision aims to elucidate the processes of loan issuance, debt collection, borrowing, and repayment, rectifying previous conceptual oversights and offering a solid foundation for future economic research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the issues related to interest-bearing capital and debt within Marx's theory of the circulation of capital, and attempts to propose a new theoretical framework to more accurately describe these concepts. The author, Takashi Satoh, first reviews Marx's concept of interest-bearing capital (i.e., capital that generates interest through lending) and conducts an in-depth analysis in conjunction with Kōzō Uno's criticisms.
Marx's classic description of interest-bearing capital can be represented by the formula `MM′CM′--ll`, where `M` stands for money, `C` stands for commodities, and `M′` and `C′` represent money and commodities with added value, respectively. However, Uno argues that Marx's expression fails to clearly distinguish between different economic behaviors, such as the transfer of money and the exchange of commodities. Based on Uno's perspective, Satoh further proposes a new theoretical framework to more accurately reflect the operational mechanisms of interest-bearing capital and debt in a capitalist economy.
Specifically, Satoh's new model emphasizes the role of financial instruments (such as bonds, notes, etc.) and distinguishes between the different roles of creditors and debtors. The new model includes two aspects:
1. **From the Creditor's Perspective**: Interest-bearing capital is represented as `MF M′-"l`, where `F` stands for financial instruments, indicating a financial right obtained by the creditor through issuing loans; and `FM′-"l` represents the process of the creditor recovering the principal and interest.
2. **From the Debtor's Perspective**: The debtor's capital circulation can be represented as `(FMCM′-TT) "-- l`, which includes the borrowing (`FMT"-`) and repayment (`MFT"-l`) processes.
Satoh also introduces a historical case—the "tally stick system" in medieval England—to illustrate how debt is created, circulated, and extinguished. Through this case, Satoh further explains the dynamic changes in debt throughout its lifecycle.
Ultimately, the model proposed by Satoh not only clarifies the transaction details between creditors and debtors but also constructs a comprehensive framework for understanding the dynamic changes of interest-bearing capital and debt in a capitalist economy. This theoretical contribution is of significant importance for deepening our understanding of the modern financial system.