Midterm outcomes of autogenous mature third molars transplantation into surgically created sockets: A retrospective cohort study

Ailimaierdan Ainiwaer,Zhongcheng Gong,Zulikamaier Zuolipahaer,Ling Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12958
2024-04-21
Dental Traumatology
Abstract:Background/Aims The purpose of this study was to observe the outcome of mature third molars transplantation into surgically created sockets with the assistance of computer designed three dimensional (3‐D) printed replicas and compare its outcome with the conventional fresh socket autotransplantation. Material and Methods This study included total of 96 mature third molars autotransplanted in 96 cases with the guidance of computer designed 3‐D printed replicas. Forty‐eight teeth autotransplanted into surgically created sockets were enrolled into the surgically created socket group and 48 teeth conventionally autotransplanted into fresh sockets were enrolled into the fresh socket group. In the surgically created socket group, mature third molars were autotransplanted into surgically prepared sockets at the site of previously missed or extracted molars in the alveolar bone and in the fresh socket group, autotransplantation of mature third molars were performed in fresh sockets of extracted diseased molars simultaneously. After transplantation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Landry Wound Healing Index (LWHI), mobility and probing depth (PD) of the transplanted teeth were measured and the patient satisfaction questionnaire were held in both group. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic examinations during the follow‐up. Results During the mean follow‐up period of 47.63 ± 16.78 months (range 18–78 months), 92 out of 96 teeth remained in situ without clinical or radiographic complications with overall success rate of 95.83%. No statistically significant differences were found in success and survival rates between the two group. The average extra‐oral time of the donor teeth were 60.76 ± 22.41 s and mean positioning trials of the donor teeth were 2.43 ± 1.19. The VAS score at Day 1 in the surgically created socket group was higher than the fresh socket group (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?