Subduction of the Proto-Tethyan Ocean: Evidence from the Huimin Formation of Lancang Group in southwestern Yunnan Province, SE Tibetan Plateau

Wang Wei,Xue ChuanDong,Yang TiamNan,Xie ZhiPeng,Dong MengMeng,Xiang Kun,Liu JingKum
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18654/1000-0569/2022.11.10
IF: 1.468
2022-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:The Lancang Group, located in the eastern part of the Changning-Menglian suture zone in the SE Tibetan Plateau, is a key to reconstruct the Proto-Tethyan tectonic evolution, however, its lithological assemblage, sedimentary age and tectonic nature have been controversial for a long time. Recent geological mapping reveals that the Huimin Formation of the Lancang Group contains basalt, basaltic andesite, lithic and crystal tuff, sandstone, mudstone and minor limestone, which have been modified by intensive deformation and greenschist facies metamorphism. Geochemically, the basaltic andesites are calc-alkaline in nature with enriched light rare earth elements ( LREEs) and large ion lithophile elements ( LILEs) and negative anomalies of Nb, Ta and Ti, indicating a subductionrelated volcanic arc setting. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating results indicate that the basaltic andesites of the Huimin Formation erupted at 461.8 +/- 5.5Ma ( MSWD = 1. 19, n = 25). The youngest peak ages of the detrital zircons from three metamorphic elastic rock samples of the Huiming Formation are 469Ma, 470 Ma and 475 Ma, respectively, which are comparable with the age of the basaltic volcanic rocks. This suggests that the youngest detrital zircons were most probably sourced from the coeval volcanic rocks. Our new geochronological and geochemical data demonstrate that the Huiming Formation volcanoclastic assemblages should be deposited in an active margin at the transition era from the Middle to Late Ordovician. Taking into account the coeval bimodal volcanic rocks in western margin of the Lanping-Simao Basin, we suggest that the Huimin Formation volcanic and volcanoclastic rocks probably represent the continental arc resulting from eastward ( present geographical position) subduction of the Proto-Tethys beneath the Yangtze Block. It is highly possible that tectonic evolution of the Paleo-Tethys and Proto-Tethys is a successive process.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?