Abstract:Purpose Existing literature in experimental accounting research suggests that accounting professionals and people with accounting backgrounds tend to have a lower level of moral reasoning and ethical development. Motivated by these findings, this paper aims to examine whether chief executive officers (CEOs) with accounting backgrounds have an impact on firms’ earnings management behavior and the level of accounting conservatism. Design/methodology/approach The authors classify CEOs into those with and without accounting backgrounds using BoardEx data. Using discretionary accruals from several different models, they do not find that CEOs with accounting backgrounds are more likely to engage in income-increasing accruals. However, the authors find that CEOs with accounting backgrounds exhibit lower levels of conservatism, proxied by C-scores and T-scores (Basu, 1997). This finding suggests that CEOs with accounting backgrounds recognize bad news more quickly than good news, consistent with the accounting principle of “anticipating all losses but anticipating no gains”. Findings The authors show that firms whose CEOs have accounting backgrounds exhibit lower levels of accounting conservatism. However, these firms do not exhibit higher levels of income-increasing discretionary accruals. This study documents the impact of CEOs’ educational backgrounds on firms’ accounting choices and confirms prior findings in experimental accounting research using large sample archival data. Originality/value This paper is the first study that investigates the impact of CEOs’ accounting backgrounds on firms’ financial reporting policy. The findings may have some policy implications. If accounting backgrounds of CEOs can make a significant difference on firms’ behavior, it is reasonable to make CEOs accountable for the quality of financial reporting. This paper is one of the first to empirically test inferences drawn by experimental accounting research. There has been a gap between archival and experimental accounting studies. The authors propose that interesting research questions can be addressed by filling in such a gap.

Problem Solving or Responsibility Avoidance? the Role of CEO Internal Attribution Tendency in Shaping Corporate Downsizing in Response to Performance Shortfalls

Too Comfortable in the Saddle? the Effect of CEO Tenure on Board Attributions of Poor Performance

Do Academic CEOs Influence Corporate Social Irresponsibility? the Moderating Effects of Negative Attainment Discrepancy and Slack Resources

Corporate Hypocrisy And Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model Of Organizational Identification And Perceived Importance Of Csr

CEO Overpayment and Dismissal: the Role of Attribution and Attention

Higher Highs and Lower Lows: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in CEO Dismissal

CEO Humility and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: Evidence Based on a New Unobtrusive Measure

Under Attack! CEO Implicit Motives and Firm Competitive Responses Following Short Seller Activism

What's in It for Me? Ceo Career Disruption Concern and Corporate Philanthropy

Determinants Of Ceo Turnover-Performance Sensitivity

Corporate Tax Avoidance: the Impact of Performance above Aspiration and CEO Experience

Does CEO Agreeableness Personality Mitigate Real Earnings Management?

Explaining CEO Retention in Misreporting Firms

Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence

Beyond Bounded Rationality: CEO Reflective Capacity and Firm Sustainability Performance

MBA CEOs, Short-Term Management and Performance

A CEO’s Childhood Family Decline and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Mediating Role of Long-Term Orientation

Corporate Social Responsibility and Chief Executive Officer Wrongdoing: A Fraud Triangle Perspective

Self-discipline or self-interest: CEOs' hometown identity and excess perks

The Impact of CEOs’ Accounting Backgrounds on Earnings Management and Conservatism

CEO Power and ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Managerial Risk-Taking