Abstract:Importance: Few adults engage in recommended levels of physical activity. Financial incentives can promote physical activity, but little is known about how the structure of these incentives influences their effectiveness (eg, how incentives are disbursed over time). Objective: To determine if it is more effective to disburse fixed total financial incentives at a constant, increasing, or decreasing rate to encourage physical activity. Design, setting, and participants: A 2-week randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2 to 15, 2014, using an online platform that automatically records daily steps of pedometer-wearing users and awards points redeemable for cash. The study population comprised 3515 adult users of the online platform in the lower 70th percentile of steps taken among all users before treatment. Data analyses were performed from August 20, 2014, to February 1, 2018. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either a control group or to 1 of 3 intervention groups during the 2 weeks of the study. Participants in the control group received a constant daily rate of $0.00001 per step. The 3 intervention groups received a 20-fold incentive increase ($0.00020 per step) distributed differently during the 2 weeks of the study: at a constant, increasing, or decreasing rate. Reminder emails explaining incentive schedules were sent the day before the intervention and halfway through the 2-week intervention. Main outcomes and measures: Change in mean daily steps during the 2-week intervention and 3 weeks after the intervention. The study had 80% power to detect a difference of 280 steps per day during the intervention at α = .05. Results: The study included 3515 participants (879 in the control condition, 879 in the constant incentive condition, 881 in the increasing incentive condition, and 876 in the decreasing incentive condition). During the intervention, compared with participants in the control group, participants receiving constant incentives logged 306.7 more steps per day (95% CI, 91.5-521.9 steps; P = .005), those receiving decreasing incentives logged 96.9 more steps per day (95% CI, 15.3-178.5 steps; P = .02), and those receiving increasing incentives logged no significant change in steps per day (1.5 steps per day; 95% CI, -81.6 to 84.7 steps; P = .97). One week after the intervention, compared with participants in the control group, only participants receiving constant incentives logged significantly more steps per day (329.5; 95% CI, 20.6-638.4; P = .04). Two and 3 weeks after the intervention, there were no significant differences compared with participants in the control group. Overall, for each $1 spent, participants in the constant incentives group logged 475.4 more steps than those in the increasing incentives group and 429.3 more steps than those in the decreasing incentives group. Conclusions and relevance: This study found that financial incentives for physical activity were more effective during a payment period when they were offered at a constant rate rather than an increasing or decreasing rate. However, this effectiveness dissipated shortly after the incentives were removed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02154256.

Promoting exercise behavior with monetary and social incentives:An empirical study based on an online fitness program

Promoting exercise behavior with monetary and social incentives: Evidence from a technology-enabled online fitness program

A Contract-Based Insurance Incentive Mechanism Boosted by Wearable Technology

Strategic Behavior in Mobile Behavioral Intervention Platforms: Evidence from a Field Quasi-experiment on a Health Management App.

Aggressive Economic Incentives and Physical Activity: The Role of Choice and Technology Decision Aids

Small sustainable monetary incentives versus charitable donations to promote exercise: Rationale, design, and baseline data from a randomized pilot study

The Effects of Different Game Elements of Healthcare Apps on Users' Fitness Activities

Using Gamification And Social Incentives To Increase Physical Activity And Related Social Cognition Among Undergraduate Students In Shanghai, China

Gamified Double-edged Sword: Exploring the Different Social Comparison Motives of Mobile Fitness App Users - Research in Progress

Individual Versus Team-Based Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Walking for Fun or for “likes”? the Impacts of Different Gamification Orientations of Fitness Apps on Consumers’ Physical Activities

Motivation crowding effects on the intention for continued use of gamified fitness apps: a mixed-methods approach

Step and Save: A Wearable Technology Based Incentive Mechanism for Health Insurance.

Methodology of an exercise intervention program using social incentives and gamification for obese children

Effect of Different Financial Incentive Structures on Promoting Physical Activity Among Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Compete with Me? The Impact of Online Gamified Competition on Exercise Behavior

Overcoming the Crowding-Out Effect of Monetary Incentive on Pro-Social Behavior.

Social-contextual influences on public participation in incentive programs of household waste separation

Chinese university students' preferences for physical activity incentive programs: a discrete choice experiment

Explaining the Outcomes of Social Gamification: A Longitudinal Field Experiment

How to Encourage Consumers' Ongoing Participation in Physical Exercise Via Feedback: Evidence from a Longitudinal Field Experiment