Abstract:Although user-generated content (UGC) is prevalent these days, high-quality UGC is still desired by readers and is crucial for the development of a website. Therefore, how to encourage users to produce high-quality content becomes a critical issue for UGC platforms. Using travel blogs collected from Lvmama.com, a leading online travel agency (OTA) in China, we investigated the effects of money-based incentives on user effort to generate high-quality content and its performance in the long run. The launch of money-based incentives after several years of running of the platform provides an ideal natural experiment setting. We applied the regression discontinuity design, and the results show that both user effort and UGC quality increased after the incentive program was released. However, the UGC quality declined quickly after that. This study concludes by presenting theoretical and managerial implications for both research and practice. This study represents one of the first attempts to investigate the effect of money-based incentives on the quality of UGC, while prior studies mainly focus on the effect of glory-based incentives on the quantity of UGC (Cavusoglu et al., 2015; Goes et al., 2016; Hamari, 2017). Unlike the glory-based incentives, the money-based incentives involve money. In the Maslow's hierarchy of needs, the money is more like the lower level of physiological needs, whereas the glory is more like the higher level of needs such as self-actualization. Therefore, it is obviously that the money reward could attract more people than the glory reward since there are more individuals having the physiological needs. Our results show users are strategic in the money-based incentives. They pretend to take more effort by writing more words and posting more photos to earn money, but the true quality measured by the number of likes does increase in long term. Another theoretical contribution to the literature of this study is the effort is measured by the quality, whereas extant literature mainly pay attention to the quantity of UGC (Cavusoglu et al., 2015; Goes et al., 2016; Hamari, 2017). For example, users’ effort in Goes et al. (2016)’s work is measured by the number of questions answered. In fact, the quality is more important than the quantity since all people need high quality information but not many low quality information. Therefore, it is more important to understand why do users contribute high quality UGC. This study shed a light on the future investigation on the UGC motivation. Our results yield direct implications for UGC platforms to encourage users to generate more high-quality content. First, the powerful effect of money-based incentives results in a 40% increment in text length on the platform, which largely increases the reading load of information searchers. Therefore, we suggest that the platform set a maximum number of words for each blog. The length limit will encourage the users to take more effort to improve the quality instead of merely including more information. Additionally, the platform should consider more about the content quality rather than the length when officially recognizing qualified blogs. Second, the positive jump of UGC quality after the rewards

A Quantitative Study of Impact of Incentive to Quality of Software Reviews

A Quantitative Study of Software Reviews Using Content Analysis Methods

A Matter of Reevaluation: Incentivizing Users to Contribute Reviews in Online Platforms

The Effects of a Platform Initiated Reviewer Incentive Program on Regular Review Generation

Money matters? Effect of reward types on customers' review behaviors

Empowering Consumer Decision-Making: Decoding Incentive vs. Organic Reviews for Smarter Choices Through Advanced Textual Analysis

Interaction between satisfaction and incentives on online reviews

Online Incentive Hierarchies, Review Extremity, and Review Quality: Empirical Evidence from the Hotel Sector

Uncertainty Reduction Vs. Reciprocity: Understanding the Effect of a Platform-Initiated Reviewer Incentive Program on Regular Ratings

Incentive Hierarchies Intensify Competition for Attention: A Study of Online Reviews

Unveiling the impacts of performance-contingent incentivized reviews on subsequent supplementary reviews

Promote Product Reviews of High Quality on E-commerce Sites

Do Money-based Incentives Improve User Effort and UGC Quality? Evidence from a Travel Blog Platform.

Quality-Aware Incentive Mechanisms Under Social Influences in Data Crowdsourcing

The Interactive Effect of Review Rating and Text Sentiment on Review Helpfulness

Smart Users: Effort Management in Earning Rewards

A review-driven customer preference measurement model for product improvement: sentiment-based importance–performance analysis

The Effects of Featuring Product Sampling Reviews on E-Tailer Websites

Posting Reviews on OTAs: Motives, Rewards and Effort

Discovering clues for review quality from author's behaviors on e-commerce sites

More Reviews May Not Help: Evidence from Incentivized First Reviews on Airbnb