Environmental Laws and Ecological Restoration Projects Enhancing Ecosystem Services in China: A Meta-Analysis.

Tao Liu,Le Yu,Xin Chen,Hui Wu,Hui Lin,Chengxiu Li,Jiaru Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116810
IF: 8.7
2023-01-01
Journal of Environmental Management
Abstract:In recent decades, China has implemented ecological restoration projects (ERPs) to improve biodiversity and ecosystem services (ESs), accordingly, a series of environmental laws were issued to guide ecological restoration. However, quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of ERPs remains ambiguous. To respond to the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UNDER), we conducted a meta-analysis of 85 peer-reviewed publications and an interdisciplinary evaluation framework based on China's environmental protection and land administration laws (EPLALs) were established to assess the effectiveness of ERPs. We found that ERPs enhanced ESs by 15-58%. Specifically, ERPs implemented in industrial/mining, and wetland regions significantly increased regulating and cultural services, and in arid and semi-arid regions mainly enhance provisioning services (72.98%). Climate factors were found to be crucial for ecological restoration effectiveness (temperature: r =-0.582, significance <0.05; precipitation: r = 0.635, significance <0.05). China's environmental laws emphasized management and investment in ecological restoration. However, the disclosure, public participation and real-time monitoring of ecological conditions need to be improved urgently. We therefore developed ERP-related policy recommenda-tions and global lessons to help improve the effectiveness of ecological restoration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?