Abstract:Technical question and answer Q&A platforms, such as Stack Overflow, provide a platform for users to ask and answer questions about a wide variety of programming topics. These platforms accumulate a large amount of knowledge, including hundreds of thousands lines of source code. Developers can benefit from the source code that is attached to the questions and answers on Q&A platforms by copying or learning from (parts of) it. By understanding how developers utilize source code from Q&A platforms, we can provide insights for researchers which can be used to improve next-generation Q&A platforms to help developers reuse source code fast and easily. In this paper, we first conduct an exploratory study on 289 files from 182 open-source projects, which contain source code that has an explicit reference to a Stack Overflow post. Our goal is to understand how developers utilize code from Q&A platforms and to reveal barriers that may make code reuse more difficult. In 31.5% of the studied files, developers needed to modify source code from Stack Overflow to make it work in their own projects. The degree of required modification varied from simply renaming variables to rewriting the whole algorithm. Developers sometimes chose to implement an algorithm from scratch based on the descriptions from Stack Overflow answers, even if there was an implementation readily available in the post. In 35.5% of the studied files, developers used Stack Overflow posts as an information source for later reference. To further understand the barriers of reusing code and to obtain suggestions for improving the code reuse process on Q&A platforms, we conducted a survey with 453 open-source developers who are also on Stack Overflow. We found that the top 3 barriers that make it difficult for developers to reuse code from Stack Overflow are: (1) too much code modification required to fit in their projects, (2) incomprehensive code, and (3) low code quality. We summarized and analyzed all survey responses and we identified that developers suggest improvements for future Q&A platforms along the following dimensions: code quality, information enhancement & management, data organization, license, and the human factor. For instance, developers suggest to improve the code quality by adding an integrated validator that can test source code online, and an outdated code detection mechanism. Our findings can be used as a roadmap for researchers and developers to improve code reuse.

API-Related Developer Information Needs in Stack Overflow

Web APIs: Features, Issues, and Expectations – A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Web APIs from Two Publicly Accessible Registries Using Stack Overflow and a User Survey

APIReal: an API Recognition and Linking Approach for Online Developer Forums

API method recommendation without worrying about the task-API knowledge gap.

Discovering, Explaining and Summarizing Controversial Discussions in Community Q&A Sites

Domain-specific Cross-Language Relevant Question Retrieval.

Leveraging Stack Overflow to detect relevant tutorial fragments of APIs

Does This Apply to Me? An Empirical Study of Technical Context in Stack Overflow

API Recommendation for Novice Programmers: Build a Bridge of Query-Task Knowledge Gap

API Caveat Explorer -- Surfacing Negative Usages from Practice

An Empirical Study on Developer Interactions in StackOverflow.

SONAS: A System to Obtain Insights on Web APIs from Stack Overflow

Understanding How and Why Developers Seek and Analyze API-related Opinions

How do developers utilize source code from stack overflow?

A Systematic Mapping Study of Crowd Knowledge Enhanced Software Engineering Research Using Stack Overflow

An Empirical Study on API Usages.

Searching StackOverflow Questions with Multi-Faceted Categorization

An API Learning Service for Inexperienced Developers Based on API Knowledge Graph

1+1>2: Programming Know-What and Know-How Knowledge Fusion, Semantic Enrichment and Coherent Application

Interpreting Cloud Computer Vision Pain-Points: A Mining Study of Stack Overflow

Exploring Research Interest in Stack Overflow -- A Systematic Mapping Study and Quality Evaluation