Abstract:Cell culture is a cornerstone of in vitro biological research. Whilst glassware was once commonplace in tissue culture facilities, in recent decades laboratories have moved towards a heavy reliance on single use plastics for routine procedures. Single use plastics allow for accessible, sterile, and often affordable equipment that comes at a high environmental cost. We developed a glassware preparation and cleaning process that allowed the comparison of "traditional" plastic-heavy, and adapted "sustainable," cell culture practices, to empirically compare the sterility, viability, and proliferative capacity of cells cultured with differing techniques, by observing IL-6 production, morphology, and proliferation rate of cultured human pulmonary fibroblast cells. During which, we calculated the carbon footprint of traditional versus sustainable methods. We additionally endeavored to provide a realistic overview of the steps required to transition to more sustainable cell culture practices and make suggestions to ease the cost, labor, and time required to uptake similar practices in other laboratories. Cells cultured using reusable glassware did not show signs of contamination or stress compared to cells grown solely with plasticware, and glassware baked at 180°C for 120 min was sufficiently decontaminated and depyrogenated for culturing these cells. An individual researcher adopting the same methodology could reduce their carbon footprint by 105.92 kg of Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) whilst also saving money (£408.78) over a 10-year period. We predict that these benefits would be greater if more researchers were to uptake these adapted practices. We intend for this paper to reassure researchers that viable, sterile, and sustainable routine cell culture can be achieved with little upfront cost to the researcher, with the prospective benefit of greatly reducing the cost to the environment. We additionally hope that increased uptake, and thus demand of more sustainable practices, encourages suppliers, policy makers, and funding bodies to make sustainable practices more accessible to individual researchers and institutions worldwide.

Reducing plastic waste in scientific protocols by 65% — practical steps for sustainable research

Reusable glassware for routine cell culture—a sterile, sustainable and affordable alternative to single-use plastics

Implementing sustainable science in the lab

Sustainability in the laboratory: evaluating the reuseability of microtiter plates for PCR and fragment detection

Impact of quality and transparency in scientific writing on the reduction of animal usage in experimental protocols: a review based in pertinent literature

Bio-contaminated Plastic Micropipette Tip Sterilization Stations: Environmentally, Economically, and Energetically Viable Solution

The future of scientific labs: how we are making our research more sustainable

Blueprint for the design, construction, and validation of a plastic and phthalate-minimised laboratory

Considering aspects of the 3Rs principles within experimental animal biology

Reduction Strategies in Animal Research: A Review of Scientific Approaches at the Intra-experimental, Supra-experimental and Extra-experimental Levels

Potential sources of microplastic contamination in laboratory analysis and a protocol for minimising contamination

Quantifying microplastic ingestion, degradation and excretion in insects using fluorescent plastics

Identifying Research Waste from Surgical Research: a Protocol for Assessing Compliance with the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations.

Flying toward a plastic-free world: Can Drosophila serve as a model organism to develop new strategies of plastic waste management?

High-Throughput Miniaturized 16S rRNA Amplicon Library Preparation Reduces Costs while Preserving Microbiome Integrity

Biomedical waste plastic: bacteria, disinfection and recycling technologies—a comprehensive review

Practical ways to recycle plastic: current status and future aspects

Plastic waste in major orthopaedic surgical procedures: descriptive and sources of improvement

A Practical Guide to 3D Printing for Chemistry and Biology Laboratories

Improving reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population into several ‘mini-experiments’

Tackling the toxics in plastics packaging