Ambient inclusion trails and microboring structures on Early Cambrian microfossils
YANG XiaoGuang,HAN Jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/N972017-00696
2017-01-01
Chinese Science Bulletin
Abstract:Ambient inclusion trails (AITs) are microtubular structures onvarious substrates that have occurred widely through the geologicrecord. They are thought to be generated by the migration of inclusiongrains (pyrite, magnetite, carbonaceous spherules), termed ″terminalpropelled grains″, through a substrate driven by pressure solutionfrom the in situ thermal decomposition of organicmatter. AITs have been reported frequently from Archean rocks, andalso commonly occurring with phosphatized fossils through late Neoproterozoicand Cambrian. During this timeframe, bioturbation was also becomingmore intense, and some analogous, AIT-like structures may be moreappropriately interpreted as endolithic micro-organisms or boringsof predatory animals. It is thus crucial to reduce potential ambiguitybetween these types of structures, and provide keys for distinguishingAITs and real biogenic structures. From the Early Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Fm. in Xixiang, Southern Shaanxi,China, numerous microfossils hosting AITs were collected and examined,with recognition of two types of co-occurring micro-borings in additionto AITs. Type 1 micro-boring structures appear as long, unbranched,cylindrical filaments with isodiametric spheroidal expansions on thesurface of steinkerns or moulds of small shelly fossils (SSFs); thesestructures correlate well with casts of known endolithic cyanobacterialfossils, Endoconchia lata . Type 2 micro-boring structuresare comprised of dense networks of microborings and microtunnels onthe phosphatized fossil materials, and are interpreted as trace fossilsof endolithic fungi. Such a co-occurrence enables us to make directcomparisons between the variations in microtubular structures. Wehave made detailed observations of their morphological and taphonomicfeatures, which collectively reveal that they are substantially differentin both formation and mechanism of preservation. In the initial stageof formation of Type 1 structures, E. lata bored within the original calcite shells of SSFs, with the resultingborings preserved as phosphatic casts during phosphatization. Type2 structures were caused by infestation of endolithic fungi on thephosphatized fossils while there were still much residual organicmaterials available for their probably heterotrophic life mode, leavingdense traces of boring behavior. With deeper burial and occurringlater in the taphonomic sequence, thermal decomposition of the surroundingorganic remains released gases that propelled small inclusions tomove through the substrates, forming AIT tunnels. Some peculiar spherical grains preserved in the distal ends ofAITs have been discovered and examined with Laser-Raman and EDS mapping.These data revealed that organic carbon is their major component.The intact spherical profiles without evidence of compression in theirtunnel-facing backsides, and the perfect fit of the grain marginsand AIT outlines suggest that these carbonaceous grains may have themselvesbeen responsible for AIT formation rather than passive accumulationor secondary filling. Such rare carbonaceous terminal propelled grainsof AITs not only explains the morphological diversity (rounded crosssections) of AIT tunnels, but also provide us with a new approachto investigate the taphonomic environment of the fossil-enriched strata.Raman geothermometry of these carbonaceous materials indicates thatthe Kuanchuanpu Fm. in this area underwent very low-grade metamorphism,with a peak metamorphic temperature estimated at 232–261°C.This implies that the fossils are mostly free from metamorphic overprints,and roughly constrains the upper limits of AIT formation. In general, as indirectly biogenic structures, the distributionof AITs is random and shows no preference for fossil taxonomy andno particular pattern. However, for those AITs that occurred on protoconodonts,there is an intriguing distribution pattern that AITs traveled aroundthe outskirts of protoconodont spines, forming distinctive spiralgrooves. Such a phenomenon may provide auxiliary evidence of theiroriginal composition by the following interpretations. The half-opengrooves indicate the original composition of protoconodont spineswere relatively soft material as opposed to hard bioapatite. The polygonalcross sections suggest, in this case, that the propelled grains wereeuhedral pyrite crystals, which were usually resulted by the decompositionof more recalcitrant organic materials. Our interpretation is thateuhedral pyrite crystals moved from inside of the spines and weretrapped by surrounding hard substrate, forming spiral grooves on thefossil-sediment interface. Our observations are consistent with thehypothesis that the original composition of the protoconodont spinesare mainly organic, such as chitin, with secondary phosphatization—thishypothesis presents a more favorable scenario for the observed morphologiesof the AITs formed by migration of euhedral pyrite crystals througha relatively soft substrate.