Abstract:Revision rhinoplasty represents the amalgamation of years of knowledge, judgment, technique, communication, self-critique, and patient selection. The surgeon's ego, economics, or personality should not persuade or dissuade him or her from undertaking revision rhinoplasty. This decision should be made after critical evaluation of his/her skills at technical execution, and communicating with the patient, as well as the patient's perception and expectations. If any concern exists, delay. Re-evaluation and referral become prudent. These patients may already be angry. They are obviously dissatisfied with their results and have frequently had attempts at revision by the previous surgeon. All these factors complicate the psychological aspects of an already difficult task. One other realization is the fact that this now becomes your result if it is the revision of a colleague's surgery. When comfortable with all of these factors, revision rhinoplasty can then be undertaken. The need for revision may be subtle or grotesque and can result from a multitude of factors: unrecognized deformities at the primary surgery; misunderstood consequences of technique; poor technique; unfavorable healing; postsurgical injury; the inevitable need for revision surgery in a difficult nose; and poor aesthetic judgment. Revision of one's own results is emotionally more difficult, but functionally and technically easier. A complete understanding of the primary surgery, access to the initial photographs, and a rapport with a patient who is willing to return are all helpful in achieving a satisfactory result. In approaching the correction of postoperative deformities, it is important to have an understanding of the anatomic abnormality as well as the aesthetic deformity. Recognizing the anatomic cause of the postsurgical deformity is more relevant to their avoidance and to the maturation of the surgeon than to their correction and the desired aesthetic result except when functional abnormalities exist and need correction. Ultimately it is the deformity that needs to be corrected, and this may or may not require the restoration of anatomic normalcy.

Revision Rhinoplasty in Asians

An Overview of Asian Rhinoplasty

Revision rhinoplasty using autologous rib cartilage in Asians

Complications Associated with Alloplastic Materials in Rhinoplasty and Their Operative Management

Revision rhinoplasty for contracted nose: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigation of Nasal Mobility in Asians and Its Change after Alloplastic Augmentation.

The latest trends in Asian rhinoplasty

Aesthetic Rhinoplasty of the Asian Nasal Tip: a Brief Review.

Three-Dimensional M-Shaped Resection for Nasal Alar Hypertrophy in Asian Patients

Use of Autologous Costal Cartilage Combined with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene in Asian Rhinoplasty

Revision rhinoplasty for monographs in facial plastic surgery contemporary rhinoplasty

Application of Paranasal Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asians with Midfacial Concavity.

Correction To: Autologous Shuffling Lipo-Aspirated Fat Combined Mechanical Stretch in Revision Rhinoplasty for Severe Contractures in Asian Patients

Nasal Tip and Alar Groove Plasty Through External Nasal Cutting in Asians: A Clinical Study

Nasal Measurements in Asians and High-Density Porous Polyethylene Implants in Rhinoplasty

A retrospective study on different kind of cartilage frameworks on Asian rhinoplasty

Hybrid Autologous Costal Cartilage Grafting for Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asian Patients

Classification and reconstructive algorithm for nasal alar defect in Asians

A comprehensive analysis of the correction of alar retraction in rhinoplasty: A systematic review

M-Shaped Auricular Cartilage Grafts for Correcting Short Nose Deformity in Asians: A Retrospective Study.

A Retrospective Study on the Reconstruction of Nasal Septal Mucosal Defects after Asian Rhinoplasty.