Abstract:Nanofibers can mimic natural tissue structure by creating a more suitable environment for cells to grow, prompting a wide application of nanofiber materials. In this review, we include relevant studies and characterize the effect of nanofibers on mesenchymal stem cells, as well as factors that affect cell adhesion and osteogenic differen-tiation. We hypothesize that the process of bone regeneration in vitro is similar to bone formation and healing in vivo, and the closer nanofibers or nanofibrous scaffolds are to natural bone tissue, the better the bone regeneration process will be. In general, cells cultured on nanofibers have a similar gene expression pattern and osteogenic behavior as cells induced by osteogenic supplements in vitro. Genes involved in cell adhesion (focal adhesion kinase (FAK)), cytoskeletal organization, and osteogenic pathways (transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/bone morphogenic protein (BMP), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and Wnt) are upregulated successively. Cell adhesion and osteo-genesis may be influenced by several factors. Nanofibers possess certain physical properties including favorable hydrophilicity, porosity, and swelling properties that promote cell adhesion and growth. Moreover, nanofiber stiffness plays a vital role in cell fate, as cell recruitment for osteogenesis tends to be better on stiffer scaffolds, with associated signaling pathways of integrin and Yes-associated protein (YAP)/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). Also, hierarchically aligned nanofibers, as well as their combination with functional additives (growth factors, HA particles, etc.), contribute to osteogenesis and bone regeneration. In summary, previous studies have indicated that upon sensing the stiffness of the nanofibrous environment as well as its other characteristics, stem cells change their shape and tension accordingly, regulating downstream pathways followed by adhesion to nanofibers to contribute to osteogenesis. However, additional experiments are needed to identify major signaling pathways in the bone regeneration process, and also to fully investigate its supportive role in fabricating or designing the optimum tissue-mimicking nanofibrous scaffolds.

Curved Nanofiber Network Induces Cellular Bridge Formation to Promote Stem Cell Mechanotransduction

Piezoelectric Nanotopography Induced Neuron-Like Differentiation Of Stem Cells

Cellular Modulation by the Mechanical Cues from Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.

Regulating Mechanotransduction in Three Dimensions using Sub‐Cellular Scale, Crosslinkable Fibers of Controlled Diameter, Stiffness, and Alignment

Dynamically Modulated Core-Shell Microfibers to Study the Effect of Depth Sensing of Matrix Stiffness on Stem Cell Fate.

Thermally Responsive Microfibers Mediated Stem Cell Fate Via Reversibly Dynamic Mechanical Stimulation

Stiffness assisted cell-matrix remodeling trigger 3D mechanotransduction regulatory Programs to induce stem cell differentiation

Reorganization of Cytoskeleton and Transient Activation of Ca2+ Channels in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Cultured on Silicon Nanowire Arrays

Nanotopographical Surfaces for Stem Cell Fate Control: Engineering Mechanobiology from the Bottom

Biological Characteristics of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Grown on Different Topographical Nanofibrous Poly-L-Lactide Meshes

Cell-mediated Fibre Recruitment Drives Extracellular Matrix Mechanosensing in Engineered Fibrillar Microenvironments.

Synergistic Influence of Fibrous Pattern Orientation and Modulus on Cellular Mechanoresponse

Harnessing Nanofiber Alignment and Pore Size to Promote Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Differentiation

Collective Organization Behaviors of Multi‐Cell Systems Induced by Engineered ECM‐Cell Mechanical Coupling

Cell Mechanics Regulates the Dynamic Anisotropic Remodeling of Fibril Matrix at Large Scale

Effects of Nanofibers on Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Environmental Factors Affecting Cell Adhesion and Osteogenic Differentiation and Their Mechanisms

Curved microstructures promote osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells via the RhoA/ROCK pathway.

Manipulation of Stem Cells Fates: The Master and Multifaceted Roles of Biophysical Cues of Biomaterials

Matrix Stiffness Modulates the Differentiation of Neural Crest Stem Cells in Vivo

Tailored Physicochemical Cues Direct Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation through Epigenetic Regulation Using Colloidal Self-Assembled Patterns

Fibrous Viscoelastic Extracellular Matrix Assists Precise Neuronal Connectivity