Abstract:Background Graph theory and machine learning have been shown to be effective ways of classifying different stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Most previous studies have only focused on inter-subject classification with single-mode neuroimaging data. However, whether this classification can truly reflect the changes in the structure and function of the brain region in disease progression remains unverified. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the classification framework, which combines structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) metrics, to distinguish mild cognitive impairment non-converters (MCInc)/AD from MCI converters (MCIc) by using graph theory and machine learning. Methods With the intra-subject (MCInc vs. MCIc) and inter-subject (MCIc vs. AD) design, we employed cortical thickness features, structural brain network features, and sub-frequency (full-band, slow-4, slow-5) functional brain network features for classification. Three feature selection methods [random subset feature selection algorithm (RSFS), minimal redundancy maximal relevance (mRMR), and sparse linear regression feature selection algorithm based on stationary selection (SS-LR)] were used respectively to select discriminative features in the iterative combinations of MRI and network measures. Then support vector machine (SVM) classifier with nested cross-validation was employed for classification. We also compared the performance of multiple classifiers (Random Forest, K-nearest neighbor, Adaboost, SVM) and verified the reliability of our results by upsampling. Results We found that in the classifications of MCIc vs. MCInc, and MCIc vs. AD, the proposed RSFS algorithm achieved the best accuracies (84.71, 89.80%) than the other algorithms. And the high-sensitivity brain regions found with the two classification groups were inconsistent. Specifically, in MCIc vs. MCInc, the high-sensitivity brain regions associated with both structural and functional features included frontal, temporal, caudate, entorhinal, parahippocampal, and calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex. While in MCIc vs. AD, the high-sensitivity brain regions associated only with functional features included frontal, temporal, thalamus, olfactory, and angular. Conclusions These results suggest that our proposed method could effectively predict the conversion of MCI to AD, and the inconsistency of specific brain regions provides a novel insight for clinical AD diagnosis.

Identifying Biomarkers of Subjective Cognitive Decline Using Graph Convolutional Neural Network for fMRI Analysis

Effective and Accurate Diagnosis of Subjective Cognitive Decline Based on Functional Connection and Graph Theory View.

Classification and Interpretability of Mild Cognitive Impairment Based on Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance and Ensemble Learning.

Cognitive Function Assessment and Prediction for Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Fusing deep learning models for subjective cognitive decline recognition via structural and functional MRI data

Altered pattern analysis and identification of subjective cognitive decline based on morphological brain network

Morphological, Structural, and Functional Networks Highlight the Role of the Cortical-Subcortical Circuit in Individuals With Subjective Cognitive Decline

Altered Functional Connectivity Pattern of Hippocampal Subfields in Individuals with Objectively-Defined Subtle Cognitive Decline and Its Association with Cognition and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers

Abnormal Dynamic Functional Networks in Subjective Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer's Disease

Predicting MCI to AD Conversation Using Integrated sMRI and rs-fMRI: Machine Learning and Graph Theory Approach

Graph Analysis of Functional Brain Topology Using Minimum Spanning Tree in Subjective Cognitive Decline.

Combined Support Vector Machine Classifier and Brain Structural Network Features for the Individual Classification of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Subjective Cognitive Decline Patients

Recurrent and Concurrent Patterns of Regional BOLD Dynamics and Functional Connectivity Dynamics in Cognitive Decline

Prediction of Clinical Scores for Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Prediction of clinical progression of subjective cognitive decline through alterations in morphology and structural covariance networks

Structural and Functional Hippocampal Changes in Subjective Cognitive Decline from the Community

Mapping Functional and Structural Brain Imaging in Subjective Cognitive Decline

Early prediction of dementia using fMRI data with a graph convolutional network approach

[P3–335]: INTRINSIC BRAIN NETWORKS OF COGNITIVE COMPONENTS IN SUBJECTIVE COGNITIVE DECLINE

Dysfunctions of Multiscale Dynamic Brain Functional Networks in Subjective Cognitive Decline.

Percentage amplitude of fluctuation and structural covariance changes of subjective cognitive decline in patients: A multimodal imaging study