Tracheal Growth after Slide Tracheoplasty in Children with Congenital Tracheal Stenosis

温皖豫,杜欣为,王顺民,徐志伟,陆兆辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20210803-00382
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the expansion of tracheal diameter 3 years after slide tracheoplasty (STP) in children with congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) .Methods:From January 2013 to December 2017, clinical and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed for children undergoing STP. Imaging studies of computed tomography (CT) and fiberoptic bronchoscopy were performed at pre-operation and 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-operation. The minimal diameter of tracheal stenosis was measured preoperatively and minimal diameter of reconstructed trachea recorded during follow-ups. Children with normal trachea were selected as control group according to age, height and weight. The differences of tracheal diameter between CTS children and normal controls were compared.Results:There were 19 boys and 24 girls with an average operative age of (1. 7±1. 3) years. The mean minimal diameter of stenotic segment was (2. 6±0. 7) mm at pre-operation, (4. 4±1. 2) mm at post-operation and (5. 7±1. 2) mm at 36 months at post-operation. The diameter of reconstructed trachea expanded significantly with time ( P<0. 001) . During 3-year follow-ups, the average growth rate of tracheal diameter was (0. 4±0. 2) mm per year. The average growth rate of tracheal diameter was (0. 8±0. 7) mm per year in the first 6 months, (0. 7±0. 6) mm per year in the first year, (0. 3±0. 3) mm per year in the second year and 0. 3±0. 3 mm per year in the third year. Linear regression analysis indicated that, at3 years post-STP, the diameter of reconstructed trachea expanded significantly with age ( R2=0. 284, P< 0. 001) , height ( R2=0. 241, P<0. 001) and weight ( R2=0. 188, P<0. 001) . Conclusions:STP does not suppress the growth of reconstructed trachea. The diameter growth of reconstructed trachea is correlated positively with age, weight and height. The growth rate of trachea is faster in the first 6 months within 3 years after STP and then slowed down.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?