Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for migrated lumbar disc:36 cases
Jian-wen DONG,Li-min RONG,Bin LIU,Qi-you WANG,Feng FENG,Rui-qiang CHEN,Pei-gen XIE,Liang-ming ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2014.08.009
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the pitfalls and technical notes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for migrated lumbar disc herniation. Methods Thirty-six consecutive patients with different types of migrated lumbar disc herniation received percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy from February 2011 to February 2014. There were 21 males and 15 females, with an average age of 41 years old. There were 2 cases of migrated L3-4 disc, 23 cases of migrated L4-5 disc and 11 cases of migrated L5-S1 disc. Based on Lee’s classiifcation of migrated disc, there were high-grade upward migration in 5 cases, low-grade upward migration in 7 cases, low-grade downward migration in 15 cases and high-grade downward migration in 9 cases. The disc fragments at the intervertebral level were removed ifrst by“between”technique, and then the epidural space was released to create manipulation space. Finally, the beveled cannula was manually advanced along the migration direction to perform endoscopic discectomy for the remanent migrated disc, which was called “intracanal” technique. Results The mean operation time was 108 minutes. The postoperative complications included transient numbness in the anterior thigh in 4 cases, transient iliopsoas weakness in 1 case, multiple nerve root injuries caused by dura tears in 1 case and exit nerve root injuries as well as incomplete endoscopic discectomy in 1 case. Complete removal of migrated disc was conifrmed in the other 35 cases. All the patients were followed up for a mean duration of 16 months ( range: 3-38 months ). The Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) scores of low back pain and leg pain at 1 day after the surgery were signiifcantly improved when compared with that preoperatively ( P<0.01 ). The low back pain VAS score, leg pain VAS score, Japanese Orthopedic Association ( JOA ) score and Chinese Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) score at 3 months after the surgery were signiifcantly improved when compared with that preoperatively ( P<0.01 ). According to the Macnab criteria, the clinical results were excellent in 25 cases, good in 7 cases, fair in 3 cases and bad in 1 case respectively. There was no recurrence or revision during the follow-up. Conclusions Good clinical results can be achieved by percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery combined with“between”technique and“intracanal”technique in most patients with migrated lumbar disc herniation. The technical notes include proper foraminotomy, satisfactory initial position of beveled cannula, manipulation of beveled cannula along the direction of migration in the epidural space and accurate discrimination of migrated disc materials. It’s still a challenge to treat high-grade migration via the transforaminal approach, due to a higher failure rate and a higher incidence of complications.