Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

TSHML: Token Shuffling under Haircut Policy Based on Machine Learning

STSIIML: Study on Token Shuffling under Incomplete Information Based on Machine Learning

Privacy Enhancement Via Dummy Points in the Shuffle Model

Adversarial behaviours in mixing coins under incomplete information

Shuffle Differential Private Data Aggregation for Random Population

No-regret Exploration in Shuffle Private Reinforcement Learning

Enhanced Privacy Bound for Shuffle Model with Personalized Privacy

Analyzing the Shuffle Model through the Lens of Quantitative Information Flow

SHAPER: A General Architecture for Privacy-Preserving Primitives in Secure Machine Learning.

Tight Differential Privacy Blanket for Shuffle Model

Beyond Statistical Estimation: Differentially Private Individual Computation via Shuffling

Segmented Private Data Aggregation in the Multi-message Shuffle Model

Distributed Differential Privacy via Shuffling Versus Aggregation: A Curious Study

Privacy Amplification via Shuffling: Unified, Simplified, and Tightened

Pseudo Unlearning via Sample Swapping with Hash

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Camel: Communication-Efficient and Maliciously Secure Federated Learning in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacy

A game‐theoretic approach of mixing different qualities of coins

Privacy Amplification via Shuffled Check-Ins

Echo of Neighbors: Privacy Amplification for Personalized Private Federated Learning with Shuffle Model

Fooling SHAP with Output Shuffling Attacks