Abstract:In Isaac Asimov’s groundbreaking anthology, I, Robot, the intricacies of human and robotic interactions take center stage, delving deep into questions of consciousness, right, morality. Characterized by Asimov’s unique blend of science fiction and philosophical pondering, the stories establish a framework to reflect on the evolving dynamics of an advanced technological society in space. Robots are capable to interact with human, to interpret complicate orders and act automatically, to help human with dull or dangerous works such as calculating and mining, even replacing the workers. Asimov also raised Three Laws of Robotics to make sure that all robots function in order. Through the lens of posthumanism, the anthology is examined for its portrayal of the blurred boundaries between human and artificial intelligences. Robots and human co-exist in the society. However, due to the limitation of “Three Laws of Robotics”, some logical contradictions inevitably appears and lead to the dysfunction of robots. As a result, I, Robot emerges as a poignant critique of humanity’s ethical and existential challenges in the face of rapid technological advancements. Building on existing research, this article attempts to forge a new perspective by reflecting on the broader implications of the artificial intelligence in Asimov’s works through the lens of post-humanism. It considers the existential questions of AI on a consciousness level, explores the egalitarian relationship between humans and machines from a rights perspective, and analyzes the concepts of “humanity” and “human-like” from a moral and ethical standpoint. It encourages readers to recognize that robots are not mere slaves to humans; instead, humans should view AI with equality and reverence towards the advancements of the era’s technology. Humanity should step away from anthropocentrism, not solely viewing humans as the measure of all things in this rapidly evolving era of AI, and properly handle the relationship between humans and non-humans. Currently, with rapid advancements in science and technology, the world of human-machine coexistence depicted by Isaac Asimov is increasingly becoming a reality. The emergence of artificial intelligences like AlphaGo and ChatGPT constantly reminds us of the advent of a post-human era. This article aims to examine the connections between AI and humans, discussing the dynamic interaction and mutual shaping between robots and human society. This article hopes to provide new thoughts and strategies for understanding and addressing the challenges brought by the age of artificial intelligence.

Do we need Asimov's Laws?

The Ethics of Robotics

Between Man and Machine: A Posthumanist Analysis of I, Robot

A Short History of the Perception of Robots and Automata from Antiquity to Modern Times

Robots: the Century Past and the Century Ahead

Debunking Robot Rights Metaphysically, Ethically, and Legally

Roboethics in Education and Society

Robotics and Artificial Intelligence [From the Editor's Desk]

We Have Always Been Robots: The History of Robots and Art

Robot Rights? Let's Talk about Human Welfare Instead

Symbiosis with artificial intelligence via the prism of law, robots, and society

Robot (Artificial Intelligence System) as a Subject (Quasi-Subject) of Law

An architecture for ethical robots

Folk-ontological stances toward robots and psychological human likeness

Artificial intelligence versus human - a threat or a necessity of evolution?

What Is Robotics? Why Do We Need It and How Can We Get It?

Differences and Origins of German and Japanese Robot Culture and Construction of the “Third Robot Culture” in China

Robots Are Friends As Well As Foes: Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Mindful and Mindless AI Robots in the United States and China.

Toward a Synthesis of Computational Power and Human Wisdom. Review of a Book by Frank Pasquale «New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI»

Fear of a Bot Planet: Anthropomorphism, Humanoid Embodiment, and Machine Consciousness

Non-Asimov Explanations Regulating AI through Transparency