Abstract:Background: The popularity of social networks has triggered a number of research efforts on network analyses of research collaborations in the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) community. Those studies mainly focus on the general understanding of collaboration networks by measuring common network metrics. More fundamental questions about collaborations still remain unanswered such as recognizing "influential" nodes and identifying potential new collaborations that are most rewarding.Methods: We analyzed biomedical research collaboration networks (RCNs) constructed from a dataset of research grants collected at a CTSA institution (i.e., University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS)) in a comprehensive and systematic manner. First, our analysis covers the full spectrum of a RCN study: from network modeling to network characteristics measurement, from key nodes recognition to potential links (collaborations) suggestion. Second, our analysis employs non-conventional model and techniques including a weighted network model for representing collaboration strength, rank aggregation for detecting important nodes, and Random Walk with Restart (RWR) for suggesting new research collaborations.Results: By applying our models and techniques to RCNs at UAMS prior to and after the CTSA, we have gained valuable insights that not only reveal the temporal evolution of the network dynamics but also assess the effectiveness of the CTSA and its impact on a research institution. We find that collaboration networks at UAMS are not scale-free but small-world. Quantitative measures have been obtained to evident that the RCNs at UAMS are moving towards favoring multidisciplinary research. Moreover, our link prediction model creates the basis of collaboration recommendations with an impressive accuracy (AUC: 0.990, MAP@3: 1.48 and MAP@5: 1.522). Last but not least, an open-source visual analytical tool for RCNs is being developed and released through Gi thub.Conclusions: Through this study, we have developed a set of techniques and tools for analyzing research collaboration networks and conducted a comprehensive case study focusing on a CTSA institution. Our findings demonstrate the promising future of these techniques and tools in understanding the generative mechanisms of research collaborations and helping identify beneficial collaborations to members in the research community. Published by Elsevier Inc.

A Directed Collaboration Network for Exploring the Order of Scientific Collaboration

Identifying Important Scholars Via Directed Scientific Collaboration Networks

Social Network Analysis of Biomedical Research Collaboration Networks in a CTSA Institution

CollaborationViz: Interactive Visual Exploration of Biomedical Research Collaboration Networks

Scientific Collaboration Network Based on MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry

Scientific Collaborations Within a University: from the Viewpoint of Complex Networks

Understanding scientific collaboration: Homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment

Dynamical evolution behavior of scientific collaboration hypernetwork

Understanding Biomedicai Research Collaborations Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study.

Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach

Benefit distribution mechanism in the team members’ scientific research collaboration network

Tie Strength Distribution in Scientific Collaboration Networks

Dynamic Network Analytics for Recommending Scientific Collaborators

Co-contributorship Network and Division of Labor in Individual Scientific Collaborations

How We Collaborate: Characterizing, Modeling and Predicting Scientific Collaborations

Multilayer representation of collaboration networks with higher-order interactions

Scientific Collaboration Network in China's Knowledge Management field

Model and Empirical Study on Some Collaboration Networks

The Community Structure of Scientific Collaboration Network

Analysing Educational Scientific Collaboration Through Multilayer Networks: Patterns, Impact and Network Generation Model.

Analysis of Scientist Collaboration Network Based on the Journal of “statistical Research”