Abstract:Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the indications for three minimally invasive approaches-T-tube external drainage, double J-tube internal drainage, and primary closure-in laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration. Methods: Three hundred eighty-nine patients with common bile duct stones who were treated at the Second People's Hospital of Hefei between February 2018 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach used: the T-tube drainage group, the double J-tube internal drainage group, and the primary closure group. General data, including sex, age, and BMI, were compared among the three groups preoperatively. Surgical time, length of hospital stay, pain scores, and other aspects were compared among the three groups. Differences in liver function, inflammatory factors, and postoperative complications were also compared among the three groups. Results: There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of sex, age, BMI, or other general data preoperatively (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between the primary closure group and the T-tube drainage group in terms of surgical time and pain scores (P < 0.05). The primary closure group and double J-tube drainage group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and time to passage of gas (P <0.05). Among the three groups, there were no statistically significant differences in inflammatory factors or liver function, TBIL, AST, ALP, ALT, GGT, CRP, or IL-6, before surgery or on the third day after surgery (P > 0.05). However, on the third day after surgery, liver function in all three groups was significantly lower than that before surgery (P<0.05). In all three groups, the levels of CRP and IL-6 were significantly lower than their preoperative levels. The primary closure group had significantly lower CRP and IL-6 levels than did the T-tube drainage group (P < 0.05). The primary closure group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of the incidences of bile leakage and electrolyte imbalance (P < 0.05). The double J-tube drainage group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of the tube dislodgement rate (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Although primary closure of the bile ducts has clear advantages in terms of length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses, it is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications, particularly bile leakage. T-tube drainage and double J-tube internal drainage also have their own advantages. The specific surgical approach should be selected based on the preoperative assessment, indications, and other factors to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications.

The Clinical Effect of Primary Duct Closure and T-tube Drainage: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching study

Biliary Drainage after Laparoscopic Choledochotomy

Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis

Laparoscopic Exploration of Common Bile Duct with Primary Closure Versus T-Tube Drainage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Is T-tube Drainage No Longer Needed for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration? A Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review

Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Randomized controlled study of primary closure versus T-tube drainage after aparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration application in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

The Safety and Efficacy of Primary Duct Closure without Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

Safety and Feasibility of Primary Closure Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Total Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis with Meta-Analysis

Evaluation and meta analysis of randomly controlled trail primary sature and T tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy with exploration and choledocholithotomy

The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary duct closure for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis

Primary Closure and Rate of Bile Leak Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Via Choledochotomy

Is the End of the T-Tube Drainage Era in Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones is Coming? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration-- a 5-year retrospective analysis

Primary Closure Versus T-tube Drainage after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

A comparative study of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy with primary suture and T-tube drainage

Laparoscopic Primary Closure of Common Bile Duct Combined with Percutaneous Cholangiographic Drainage for Treating Choledocholithiasis