Abstract:In human society, sharing losses is at least as common as sharing gains. Although the psychological and neural processes underlying the latter have been investigated in depth, those related to the former are not clear. Our recent study demonstrates an increased demand for fairness under adversity (e.g. loss sharing). Here we investigated how our brain encodes unfairness in the loss and gain domains using event-related potentials (ERP) technique. We adopted the Ultimatum Game (UG) to probe the processes related to fairness consideration in either gain or loss domain. In UG, two players, the proposer and the responder, bargain on how to divide a certain amount of money endowed by the experimenter. The proposer suggests a division policy, on which the responder evaluates and decides whether to accept. Upon acceptance, the money is divided as suggested; while rejection results in both players going empty-handed. Participants, as responders, were required to decide whether to accept an offer that was either fair (equal or nearly equal division) or unfair in both gain and loss domain. Offers were either made by the human partner or by the computer partner. Behavioral results replicated our previous findings that the rejection rate of unfair offers was higher in the loss than in the gain domain. ERP results revealed that the N1 amplitude was more pronounced for human partners compared with computer partners, however, this effect was only observed in the gain domain. When interacting with computer partners, unfair offers and offers in the loss domain were associated with larger N350 compared with fair offers and offers in the gain domain, and offers in the gain domain elicited larger P2 than offers in the loss domain, whereas fair offers and offers in the gain domain were associated with larger LPP than unfair offers and offers in the loss domain. In addition, these differences in ERP responses were diminished when the interacting partners were humans. These findings suggest that fairness processing is modulated by the property of the partner and gain-loss domain. In human-computer interaction, unfair offers and offers in the loss domain elicit more inhibition and conflict resolving process, while fair offers and offers in the gain domain are more motivationally significant to human. The present findings support the view that fairness processing is context-dependent, in which factors like gain-loss domain and the property of the partner play a role.

The impact of social comparison and (un)fairness on upstream indirect reciprocity: Evidence from ERP

Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: an ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

Outcone Fairness Effect in the Third-party Context:An ERP Study

Social Distance Modulates Recipient's Fairness Consideration in the Dictator Game: an ERP Study

Influence of Empathic Concern on Fairness-Related Decision Making: Evidence from ERP

Counterfactual Comparison Modulates Fairness Consideration in the Mini-Ultimatum Game: an Event-Related Potentials Study.

Neural Correlates of Decision Making after Unfair Treatment.

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies.

The Impact of Social Comparison on the Neural Substrates of Reward Processing: an Event-Related Potential Study

Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event‐related potential signals

Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game

The impact of social comparison on self-deception: An event-related potentials study

Spatiotemporal Cortical Activation Underlying Reward Processing under “worse off Than Some, Better off Than Many” Comparison: an ERP Study

The Effect Of Altruistic Tendency On Fairness In Third-Party Punishment

Neural Responses to Unfairness and Fairness Depend on Self-Contribution to the Income.

Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

The Context-Dependency of Fairness Processing: Evidence from ERP Study

Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making

The Effect of Task Difficulty and Self-Contribution on Fairness Consideration: An Event-Related Potential Study

Social Comparison Manifests in Event-related Potentials.