Rule Design and Application Trade-off of Countercyclical Capital Regulation

Xu Youchuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-0289.2022.05.017

2022-01-01

Abstract:Current regulatory proposals focus on the empirical-based rule design of countercyclical capital, which is a unilateral or symmetrical bilateral design with high discretionary components under deterministic scenario. While the theory-based rule aims to conduct a bilateral, asymmetric or looking-forward design under random scenario, so as to ensure that the timing and level of countercyclical capital provision and release can automatically adapt to the cyclical change of reference indicator, and provide signal guidance for the regulatory operation. In order to elaborate the key technical issues and improvement directions on the rule design of countercyclical capital regulation, the paper reviews the relevant literatures on the procyclicality of bank capital regulation and its countercyclical regulation, deeply discusses the common design ideas, basic elements, technical disputes and possible improvement directions of the two rules, and puts forward several innovative rule design ideas, their practical applications and empirical estimation issues are discussed as well. It’s believed to broaden the vision of countercyclical capital regulation rule design and macro-prudential regulation and to be helpful for the regulatory authorities to formulate or activate relevant rules.