Isolation and Crystallographic Characterization of Lu 3 N@C 2n (2n=80-88): Cage Selection by Cluster Size.
Wang-Qiang Shen,Li-Piao Bao,Shuai-Feng Hu,Xue-Jiao Gao,Yun-Peng Xie,Xing-Fa Gao,Wen-Huan Huang,Xing Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201804651
2018-01-01
Chemistry - A European Journal
Abstract:The small Sc3N cluster has only been found in such small cages as C-2n (2n=68, 78, 80, 82), whereas the large M3N (M=Y, Gd, Tb, Tm) clusters choose those larger cages C-2n (2n=82-88). Herein, concrete experimental evidence is presented to establish the size effect of the internal metallic cluster on selecting the outer cage of endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) by using a medium-sized metal, lutetium, which possesses an ionic radius between Sc and Gd. A series of lutetium-containing EMFs have been obtained and their structures are unambiguously determined as Lu3N@I-h(7)-C-80, Lu3N@D-5h(6)-C-80, Lu3N@C-2v(9)-C-82, Lu3N@C-s(51365)-C-84, Lu3N@D-3(17)-C-86, and Lu3N@D-2(35)-C-88 by single-crystal X-ray diffraction crystallography. It was confirmed that the encaged Lu3N cluster always adopts a planar geometry in Lu3N@C80-88 isomers to ensure substantial metal-cage/metal-nitrogen interactions. As a result, the Lu3N cluster selects the C-2v(9)-C-82 cage, which also encapsulates Sc3N, instead of the C-s(39663)-C-82 cage which is more suitable for M3N (M=Y, Gd, Tb, Tm). However, different from Sc3N, Lu3N can also template the C84-88 cages which are absent for Sc3N-containing EMFs, confirming clearly the size effect of the internal cluster on selecting the outer cage.