Abstract:Summary: The evaluation of the short-term and long-term of disruptive peer effects in the primary edu-cation stage has become a hot topic in labor economics. Based on the latest Chinese Education Panel Survey(CEPS)data in 2014,this paper empirically examines the impact of disruptive peers on the student test scores. When studying the peer effects,there are two key problems to solve,reflection and self-selection. The so-called "reflection" refers to the problem of mutual influences between peers. It is essentially a reverse causal-ity problem that is often encountered in the setting of econometric models,because it is difficult to tell wheth-er the disruptive students have an impact on other students or some students have a bad influence on the sur-rounding students,which leads to a biased and inconsistent estimator if researchers use the surrounding stu-dents' performance to explain other students'. Self-selection mainly refers to the fact that families don't choose schools and classes completely randomly. In order to overcome the estimation bias caused by the problem of reflection and self-selection,we define the class environment as the proportion of disruptive students in the class rather than the peer achievement used in the traditional literature, and we also control the cohort features. After controlling the individual and family factors,we find that students exposed to a disruptive environ-ment have a significant lower education performance. This effect is more significant for the third grade stu-dents in the junior high school. One percent increase of the disruptive peers will result in about 0.2 decreasing in the average standardized test score. The result also shows that the acadamic performance of male students, students with poor family conditions and boarding students is more sensitive to class peers. The heterogeneity analysis of school types shows that peer effects are more obvious in schools with poor education and in town-ship/rural schools. Furthermore,quantile regression results show that the negative effect of disruptive peers has a greater impact on poorly performing students. This paper is helpful to enrich the academic cognition of educational production function and provide a useful reference for future education policy. The underlying implication of our study is that if there are reason-able and feasible policies that can change students' class environment or a more reasonable class division plan,it will effectively improve the educational achievements of students. In addition,the attention to students' family environment should be strengthened,especially those students who perform poorly in school,and strengthening communication and psychological counseling will bring about significant spillovers.

Does a “bad Apple” Spoil the Bunch? the Impact of Low-Achieving Students on Non-Cognitive Outcomes

Middle-achieving Students Are Also My Peers: the Impact of Peer Effort on Academic Performance

Classroom compositional effects on low-ability students' achievement in China

Disruptive Peers in the Classroom and Students’ Academic Outcomes: Evidence and Mechanisms

Reconsidering Peer Assignment Optimizations : How Does Non-Cognitive Peer Difference Matter ? ∗ †

Good learners or trouble makers? Study on the relationship between academic performance and antisocial behavior of junior high school students

Deskmates: Reconsidering Optimal Peer Assignments Within the Classroom

Staying Near Vermilion Gets Reder ,staying Near Ink Gets Blacker——Asymmetric Peer Effects in Education

Family Socioeconomic Status and Adolescents’ Academic Achievement: The Moderating Roles of Subjective Social Mobility and Attention

The Evaluation of Peer Effects in Primary Education

Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Evidence from A Chinese Middle School

Early childhood health shocks, classroom environment, and social-emotional outcomes

Peer Effects of Migrant and Left-behind Children: Evidence from Classroom Random Assignment in China

Peer effects on low-income children's learning and development

The Externalities of Preschool Attendees in Middle School Classes

Stuck in Place? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Reputational Information on Student Evaluations

The Effects of Self-Controlled Peers on Students’ Academic Performance

Better Cognition, Better School Performance? Evidence from Primary Schools in China

The Effect of Teacher Gender on Students' Academic and Noncognitive Outcomes

What drives academic peer effects in middle school classrooms in China: Peer composition or peer performance?

Unanticipated benefits: left-behind peers and improved health in rural Chinese classrooms