Mid-term Efficacy Grading Evaluation and Predictive Factors of Magnetic Resonance–guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery for Painful Bone Metastases: a Multi-Center Study

Xiaorui Yin,Na Tang,Xuhui Fan,Shengping Wang,Junhai Zhang,Jianjun Gu,Han Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09118-2
IF: 7.034
2022-01-01
European Radiology
Abstract:MR imaging–guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) is an emerging non-invasive treatment. It is helpful in investigating the mid-term grading efficacy and safety of MRgFUS, and possible risk factors in participants with painful bone metastases. This four-center prospective study enrolled 96 participants between June 2016 and May 2019 with painful bone metastases. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Brief Pain Inventory-Quality of Life (BPI-QoL) score, morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and the adverse events (AEs) were recorded before and at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after MRgFUS. The repeated ANOVA tests were used to analyze the change in NRS and BPI-QoL, and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the possible risk factors. A total of 82 participants completed the 3-month follow-up period. And 16 (19.5 • MRgFUS can be considered a non-invasive, effective, and safe modality to treat painful bone metastases. • The NRS and BPI-QoL score at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months all decreased significantly (p < 0.001) after receiving MRgFUS. Among 82 participants, 16 (19.5 • According to logistic regression analysis, non-perfused volume ratio and the bone metastases lesion type were the affecting factors to predict the mid-term efficacy of MRgFUS. The adjusted OR of non-perfused volume ratio was 0.86 (p = 0.001), and osteoblastic lesion type was 0.06 (p = 0.025).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?