Abstract:As one of the ways for multinational companies to obtain the advantages of sustainable development, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been widely recognized by the academic community. Research featuring the influence of corporate governance (CG) on the environmental information disclosure of multinational corporations (MNCs) have gained much attention, but there is a lack of research into the empirical examination of cross-national samples. Drawing on Agency Theory, this study fills the gap by making a theoretical exploration and empirical test on relationships between CG and MNCs’s environmental disclosure. Board independence, board size, board meeting frequency and their relationships to the environmental disclosure of MNCs are observed in this study. In order to examine the aforementioned relationships, this study incorporates measurement techniques used by Van Staden and Hooks (2007) [1] and Global Reporting Initiative 4.0 guideline (GRI4.0) and develops a set of comprehensive, systematic measurement standards to appraise the environmental information disclosure of corporations. The content analysis method is used to assess the environmental disclosure of 151 companies from China, the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, according to Forbes Global 2000 Ranking in 2019. We find that board independence, the board size, and the frequency of board meetings are all positively associated with the environmental disclosure of MNCs. This finding indicates that more independent boards of directors, larger boards, and more frequent board meetings are CG mechanisms which lower the likelihood for an opportunistic behaviour and increase information transparency and voluntary implementation of the disclosure, effectively enhancing the environmental disclosure of MNCs. This impact of CG on corporations’ environmental information disclosure exists across country contexts.

Institutionalizing Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Historical Webpages of the Fortune Global 500 Companies, 1997–2009

Institutionalizing CSR Reporting: Historical Webpages of Fortune 500 Companies, 1997-2009

Whose Call to Answer: Institutional Complexity and Firms' Csr Reporting

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Media Reports, and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The Emergence, Variation, and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Public Sphere, 1980–2004: The Exposure of Firms to Public Debate

Doing More on the Corporate Sustainability Front: A Longitudinal Analysis of CSR Reporting of Global Fashion Companies

The Influence of Corporate Governance on the Environmental Information Disclosure of MNCs: An Empirical Study on Corporations from China, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States

Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: the case of 106 central enterprises

Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: A Systematic Literature Review

Examining Corporate Communications of Environmental Responsibility on Corporate Websites: Main Themes, Linguistic Features, and Text Reuse

Building Institutions Based on Information Disclosure: Lessons from GRI's Sustainability Reporting

Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China

Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: From a Corporate Governance Perspective

Global Evolution of Environmental and Social Disclosure in Annual Reports*

The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance

Factors that Drive Chinese Listed Companies in Voluntary Disclosure of Environmental Information

Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises

Interaction of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting at the Crossroads of Green Innovation Performance and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of the Enterprise Life Stage

Does digitization drive corporate social responsibility?

Cover-up or true? does CSR disclosure really contribute to corporate environmental performance?

Foreign directors and corporate social responsibility reporting in China: the moderating role of institutional pressures