Environmental Concerns, Particulate Matter Exposure, Cardiovascular Events in China: A Cohort Study

Kuiying Gu,Miao Zhou,Yi Zhou,Liang Zhao,Hui Sun,Wei Luo,Yu Liu,Pengyue Dou,Hui Wang,Limei Ke,Wannian Liang,Cunrui Huang,Qian Di
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4244744
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: PM2.5 exposure is associated with multiple adverse health outcomes, and government and media environmental concerns can reduce PM2.5 pollution. However, few empirical studies have estimated health co-benefits of PM2.5 pollution reduction induced by government and media environmental concerns. Methods: We used individual-level follow-up data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, a prospective nationwide cohort of middle-aged and elder people, and chose cardiovascular disease as the outcome of interest. We quantified media and government environmental concerns with text-mining algorithm, obtained high-resolution PM2.5 and matched with cohort data. The accelerated failure time model and mediation model were used to explore the association between environmental concerns and time to cardiovascular disease onset, as well as related mechanisms.Findings: Government and media environmental concerns were correlated with PM2.5 pollution levels. Every 1 unit increase in government and media environmental concerns and their synergistic effect were significantly associated with 1.0150 (95% CI: 1.0032-1.0268), 1.0117 (95% CI: 1.0060-1.0175), 1.0139 (95%CI: 1.0065-1.0214) longer time to stroke onset, respectively. Similar results also held for heart attacks, but not statistically significant. PM2.5 and gross domestic product (GDP) mediated the association between environmental concerns and longer time to stroke and heart attack onset. Associations of PM2.5 exposure and environmental concerns with stroke and heart attack were similar in different subgroups.Interpretation: Environmental concerns can yield significant health co-benefits among older adults, reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, regardless of subgroup variable changes. Pollution reduction and higher GDP level explained the co-benefits of environmental concerns in public health.Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42277419) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFA0606200 and 2018YFA0606203).Declaration of Interest: The authors declare no competing interest.Ethical Approval: The Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University has approved CHARLS and all participants were required to provide written informed consent while they participate in the survey.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?