Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Knowledge Stock, Competition Orientation and Latecomer Firms’ Attention to Emerging Technologies

Dynamic Competences and Technological Innovation in Chinese Enterprises

Market Insights Exploration and Product Technology Build-Up: Latecomer Firms’ Catch-Up Strategies

Innovators' 'imitation': Whether and How Does Reactive Search Affect the Performance of Incumbent Firms? Evidence from China

The Impact of Technology Identification Policy on Firm Innovation: Evidence from China

KCP and its influencing factors in technological entrepreneurial firm

Managing External Knowledge Search: the Multiple and Contingent Roles of Absorptive Capacity.

Technology Strategy, Technological Context and Technological Catch-Up in Emerging Economies: Industry-Level Findings from Chinese Manufacturing

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

Why Are the Industrial Firms of Emerging Economies Short-Termistic in Innovation? Industry-level Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing.

Pattern for capital and knowledge accumulation in the technology-based firms

Technology Stocks: A Study on the Characteristics That Help Transfer Public Research to Industry

Can attention allocation affect firm’s environmental innovation: the moderating role of past performance

Exploring the Mechanism of Path-Creating Strategy for Latecomers: a Combined Approach of Econometrics and Causal Machine Learning

Private Equity Investment and Corporate Technological Innovation: An Empirical Examination Based on Chinese Mainboard-listed High-Tech

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Invest in Innovation or Not? How Managerial Cognition and Attention Allocation Shape Corporate Responses to Performance Shortfalls

The impact of ESG performance on firms' technological innovation: evidence from China

Tmt'S Attention Towards Financial Goals And Innovation Investment: Evidence From China

Exploitation or Exploration? Managerial Myopia, Economic Policy Uncertainty and Ambidextrous Innovation Investment

Research on the Impact of ESG Rating on Innovation in Chinese Enterprises