Abstract:Knowledge tracing aims to track students' knowledge status over time to predict students' future performance accurately. In a real environment, teachers expect knowledge tracing models to provide the interpretable result of knowledge status. Markov chain-based knowledge tracing (MCKT) models, such as Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, can track knowledge concept mastery probability over time. However, as the number of tracked knowledge concepts increases, the time complexity of MCKT predicting student performance increases exponentially (also called explaining away problem). When the number of tracked knowledge concepts is large, we cannot utilize MCKT to track knowledge concept mastery probability over time. In addition, the existing MCKT models only consider the relationship between students' knowledge status and problems when modeling students' responses but ignore the relationship between knowledge concepts in the same problem. To address these challenges, we propose an inTerpretable pRobAbilistiC gEnerative moDel (TRACED), which can track students' numerous knowledge concepts mastery probabilities over time. To solve explain away problem, we design long and short-term memory (LSTM)-based networks to approximate the posterior distribution, predict students' future performance, and propose a heuristic algorithm to train LSTMs and probabilistic graphical model jointly. To better model students' exercise responses, we proposed a logarithmic linear model with three interactive strategies, which models students' exercise responses by considering the relationship among students' knowledge status, knowledge concept, and problems. We conduct experiments with four real-world datasets in three knowledge-driven tasks. The experimental results show that TRACED outperforms existing knowledge tracing methods in predicting students' future performance and can learn the relationship among students, knowledge concepts, and problems from students' exercise sequences. We also conduct several case studies. The case studies show that TRACED exhibits excellent interpretability and thus has the potential for personalized automatic feedback in the real-world educational environment.

Dual-State Knowledge Tracing Model with Mutual Information Maximization

Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks With Rich Features for Knowledge Tracing

A Temporal Convolutional Knowledge Tracing Model Integrating Forgetting Factors and Item Response Theory

Deep Knowledge Tracing with Side Information

Augmenting Interpretable Knowledge Tracing by Ability Attribute and Attention Mechanism

DKVMN-KAPS: Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks Knowledge Tracing With Students' Knowledge-Absorption Ability and Problem-Solving Ability

A Deeper Knowledge Tracking Model Integrating Cognitive Theory and Learning Behavior

Deep Knowledge Tracing is an implicit dynamic multidimensional item response theory model

Knowledge ontology enhanced model for explainable knowledge tracing

DGEKT: A Dual Graph Ensemble Learning Method for Knowledge Tracing

What is wrong with deep knowledge tracing? Attention-based knowledge tracing

Multi-Factors Aware Dual-Attentional Knowledge Tracing

Interpretable Knowledge Tracing: Simple and Efficient Student Modeling with Causal Relations

A probabilistic generative model for tracking multi-knowledge concept mastery probability

Knowledge Tracing for Complex Problem Solving: Granular Rank-Based Tensor Factorization

Exploiting Multiple Question Factors for Knowledge Tracing

Towards more accurate and interpretable model: Fusing multiple knowledge relations into deep knowledge tracing

CMKT: Concept Map Driven Knowledge Tracing

A Self-Attentive model for Knowledge Tracing

Incorporating Rich Features into Deep Knowledge Tracing

Uncertainty-preserving deep knowledge tracing with state-space models