Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

Adversarial Examples Detection Based on Error Level Analysis and Space Mapping

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

Attack As Defense: Characterizing Adversarial Examples Using Robustness.

Adversarial Examples Detection Beyond Image Space.

Adversarial Examples Detection with Enhanced Image Difference Features based on Local Histogram Equalization

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

Adversarial Examples Detection Through the Sensitivity in Space Mappings.

Detecting Localized Adversarial Examples: A Generic Approach Using Critical Region Analysis

Analyzing the Noise Robustness of Deep Neural Networks

Defense against adversarial attacks based on color space transformation

Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning

Adversarial example detection based on saliency map features

Adversarial example defense based on image reconstruction

Detecting Adversarial Examples

Detection defense against adversarial attacks with saliency map

Adversarial Example Defense via Perturbation Grading Strategy

Defense against adversarial attacks by low‐level image transformations

Adversarial perturbation denoising utilizing common characteristics in deep feature space

Latent Adversarial Defence with Boundary-guided Generation

General Adversarial Defense via Pixel Level and Feature Level Distribution Alignment

Detecting Adversarial Examples Through Image Transformation