Abstract:This study sheds light on the literature on knowledge-hiding behavior in organizations and highlights a better and deeper understanding of the reasons for giving rise to knowledge hiding. In recent decades, knowledge hiding has been subjected to numerous studies in systematic literature reviews and organizational management regarding its impact on outcomes such as individual and organizational performance; however, the mechanism by which knowledge hiding is influenced by antecedents and the process of leading knowledge hiding has not been actively verified. In addition, most previous studies have classified knowledge hiding into one-factor or three-factor dimensions: evasive hiding, playing dumb, and rationalized hiding. To address these issues and limitations, we aimed to conduct empirical research, which have focused on four new dimensions (playing dumb, evasive hiding, rationalized hiding, and procrastination) of knowledge-hiding behavior. Unlike previous research, we provide a research framework for the process of hiding knowledge and verify the significance of the research model, drawing on the social exchange theory and conservation of resources theory to explore and verify the process of hiding knowledge. Specifically, we argue that knowledge hiding is caused by exploitative leadership, and psychological distress as mediators in the relationship between these two variables. Moreover, the moderating and mediating effects of leader incivility were verified. To empirically test the research model, a survey was conducted with 287 employees from small- and medium-sized enterprises in China. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), SPSS PROCESS, and AMOS software were used for statistical analyzes. The findings provide evidence that exploitative leadership positively influences both psychological distress and the four dimensions of knowledge hiding. In addition, the mediating effect of psychological distress and the moderating effect of leader incivility were verified and shown to be statistically significant. Based on these findings, the theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed. Overall, the most important contribution is expanding the research field, as this is the first empirical study on the four dimensions of knowledge hiding.

A Virtual Net Locks Me In: How and When Information and Communication Technology Use Intensity Leads to Knowledge Hiding

Study of Influential Mechanism of Workplace Loneliness and Knowledge Hiding

Effect of Interpersonal Injustice on Knowledge Hiding Behavior: Moderating Role of High-Performance Work Stress

Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of Users' Knowledge Hiding Behavior in Virtual Question-and-Answer Community

Working with an Invisible Active User: Understanding Trust in Technology and Co-User from the Perspective of a Passive User

How and when Intragroup Relationship Conflict Leads to Knowledge Hiding: the Roles of Envy and Trait Competitiveness

Sharing or Hiding? Exploring the Influence of Social Cognition and Emotion on Employee Knowledge Behaviors within Enterprise Social Media

The social-psychological approach in understanding knowledge hiding within international R&D teams: An inductive analysis

Enterprise social media usage and knowledge hiding: a motivation theory perspective

My Knowledge: the Negative Impact of Territorial Feelings on Employee’s Own Innovation Through Knowledge Hiding

The Impacts of Internet Knowledge on College Students' Intention to Continue to Use the Internet.

What is bullying hiding? Exploring antecedents and potential dimension of knowledge hiding

Why and when Do People Hide Knowledge?

Does Technostress Increase R&D Employees' Knowledge Hiding in the Digital Era?

Unlocking the relationships between developmental human resource practices, psychological collectivism and knowledge hiding: the moderating role of affective organizational commitment

The mask of hidden knowledge behind advanced technologies: A case of distress, unlearning and knowledge transfer

Exploring the effect of perceived overqualification on knowledge hiding: The role of psychological capital and person-organization fit

Why should I let them know? Effects of workplace incivility and cynicism on employee knowledge hiding behavior under the control of ethical leadership

Role stress, emotional exhaustion, and knowledge hiding: The joint moderating effects of network centrality and structural holes

Expanding the dimensions of knowledge hiding: testing a moderated mediation model and analyzing the mediating role of psychological distress using PLS-SEM

Impacts of territoriality on employee workplace innovation within R&D organizations: The full mediating role of knowledge hiding