Abstract:Objective: To Compare the effects and safety of lumen reshaping after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford B type aortic dissection (AD) at different intervention times. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 189 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection treated with TEVAR at the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College from January 2016 to December 2020.Based on the time from onset to surgery, patients were divided into an early intervention group (≤14 days, n=127) and a delayed intervention group (>14 days, n=62).The diameters of the total aorta, true lumen and false lumen at different times and planes (S1 plane: at the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery; S2 plane: at the lower edge of the left atrium; S3 plane: at the upper edge of the celiac trunk) post-surgery were compared between the two groups, and the rate of change in diameters of true and false lumens across these planes was calculated. The patients were followed until December 1st, 2023, and the median follow-up time was 45(40, 49) months. The postoperative complications and survival of the two groups were compared. Results: The early intervention group comprised 86 men and 41 women, with an average age of (58.3±10.7) years. The delayed intervention group included 41 men and 21 women, with an average age of (58.5±9.2) years. Both groups had an operation success rate of 100%. Six months post-surgery, the early intervention group had an expansion rate of the true lumen diameter at planes S2 and S3 of 40.1%(25.5%, 56.1%) and 5.3%(-2.5%, 15.8%), respectively, which was superior to the delayed intervention group's 18.5%(10.6%, 39.8%) and 1.0%(-8.2%, 9.6%) (both P<0.05).The early intervention group had a reduction rate of the false lumen diameter at planes S1, S2, and S3 of -56.2%(-61.3%, -48.8%), -70.4%(-81.8%, -56.6%), and -5.4%(-17.4%, 0.1%), respectively, better than the delayed intervention group's -44.2%(-53.7%, -38.3%), -49.0%(-57.6%, -35.8%), and -3.1%(-6.7%, 1.8%) (all P<0.05).At plane S1, the true lumen diameter of patients in both groups showed an increasing trend over 36 months post-surgery, while the false lumen diameter showed a decreasing trend (both P<0.05).At plane S2, the true lumen diameter of patients in the early intervention group exhibited an increasing trend over 36 months post-surgery, and the false lumen diameter exhibited a decreasing trend (both P<0.05).At plane S3, the total aortic diameter of patients in the delayed intervention group showed a slight increasing trend over 36 months post-surgery (P<0.05).The overall survival time were 45.0 months (95%CI: 42.9-47.1) for patients in the early intervention group and 46.0 months (95%CI: 43.5-48.5) for those in the delayed intervention group, with no statistically significant difference observed (P>0.05).The incidence rates of complications such as aortic rupture, retrograde Type A dissection, new distal endograft dissection, endoleak, paraplegia, and others showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05), with no cases of stent migration or deformation observed. Conclusion: Early intervention for Stanford type B aortic dissection provides a better aortic remodeling outcome than delayed intervention, with similar safety.

Impact and Risk Factors Associated with False Lumen Thrombus Status Within Stent Segments of Type B Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Repair

Risk factors of incomplete thrombosis in the false lumen after endovascular treatment of extensive acute type B aortic dissection

Fate of Distal Aorta after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: Change and Persistency of Postoperative False Lumen Status.

Research progress on partial thrombosis of false lumen in acute Stanford B aortic dissection

GW27-e0166 False Lumen Status in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Exploring hemodynamic mechanisms and re-intervention strategies for partial false lumen thrombosis in Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic aortic endovascular repair

Early and Midterm Results of Endovascular Repair of Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection:Report of 121 Cases

False lumen patency status and outcomes after endovascular repair of uncomplicated chronic type B dissection

False Lumen Stent-Grafts for Repair of Postdissection Aortic Aneurysms.

Fate and Consequences of the False Lumen After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection

The Number of Preoperative Abdominal False Lumen–perfused Small Branches is Related to Abdominal Aortic Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

Influence of Distal Extension of False Lumen on Adverse Aortic Events after TEVAR in Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.

In situ fenestration (ISF) versus single-branched stent graft (SBSG) implantation in the management of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery

Total Endovascular Repair of an Intraoperative Stent-Graft Deployed in the False Lumen of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report

Preoperative thoracic false lumen branches are predictors of aortic enlargement after stent grafting for DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection

False lumen hemodynamics and partial thrombosis in chronic aortic dissection of the descending aorta

Endovascular Stent-graft Treatment for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

[Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection with Extra-Anatomic Bypass].

[Analysis of the effect and safety of lumen reshaping after endovascular repair of Stanford B type aortic dissection at different intervention times]

False Lumen Intercostal Artery Embolization to Halt Type R Entry Flow in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Patients with Chronic Versus Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Implantation of a Stent Graft: a Single-Center Report