Abstract:Purpose Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) has become popular in the information systems (IS) field for modeling structural relationships between latent variables as measured by manifest variables. However, while researchers using PLS-SEM routinely stress the causal-predictive nature of their analyses, the model evaluation assessment relies exclusively on criteria designed to assess the path model's explanatory power. To take full advantage of the purpose of causal prediction in PLS-SEM, it is imperative for researchers to comprehend the efficacy of various quality criteria, such as traditional PLS-SEM criteria, model fit, PLSpredict, cross-validated predictive ability test (CVPAT) and model selection criteria. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review was conducted to understand empirical studies employing the use of the causal prediction criteria available for PLS-SEM in the database of Industrial Management and Data Systems (IMDS) and Management Information Systems Quarterly (MISQ). Furthermore, this study discusses the details of each of the procedures for the causal prediction criteria available for PLS-SEM, as well as how these criteria should be interpreted. While the focus of the paper is on demystifying the role of causal prediction modeling in PLS-SEM, the overarching aim is to compare the performance of different quality criteria and to select the appropriate causal-predictive model from a cohort of competing models in the IS field. Findings The study found that the traditional PLS-SEM criteria (goodness of fit (GoF) by Tenenhaus, R2 and Q2) and model fit have difficulty determining the appropriate causal-predictive model. In contrast, PLSpredict, CVPAT and model selection criteria (i.e. Bayesian information criterion (BIC), BIC weight, Geweke–Meese criterion (GM), GM weight, HQ and HQC) were found to outperform the traditional criteria in determining the appropriate causal-predictive model, because these criteria provided both in-sample and out-of-sample predictions in PLS-SEM. Originality/value This research substantiates the use of the PLSpredict, CVPAT and the model selection criteria (i.e. BIC, BIC weight, GM, GM weight, HQ and HQC). It provides IS researchers and practitioners with the knowledge they need to properly assess, report on and interpret PLS-SEM results when the goal is only causal prediction, thereby contributing to safeguarding the goal of using PLS-SEM in IS studies.

How SCM Causal Diagrams Differ from PLS-PM and CB-SEM Path Diagrams

Learning Cluster Causal Diagrams: an Information-Theoretic Approach

Comparing Causal Frameworks: Potential Outcomes, Structural Models, Graphs, and Abstractions

Causal Inference Grounded in Causal Diagrams: Benefits, Limitations, and Opportunities for the Information Systems Field

Diagrammatic Modelling of Causality and Causal Relations

Beyond Structural Causal Models: Causal Constraints Models

Causal Modeling of Dynamical Systems

Causal Discovery in Linear Structural Causal Models with Deterministic Relations

Dynamic Structural Causal Models

Standardizing Structural Causal Models

Distribution-consistency Structural Causal Models

Causal Order Discovery based on Monotonic SCMs

Inductive diagrams for causal reasoning

Constraint-based Causal Discovery for Non-Linear Structural Causal Models with Cycles and Latent Confounders

How novice analysts understand supply chain process models: an experimental study of using diagrams and texts

Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research

Causal Diagrams for Structural Engineers

Causal Discovery from Poisson Branching Structural Causal Model Using High-Order Cumulant with Path Analysis

Causal Modeling in Multi-Context Systems: Distinguishing Multiple Context-Specific Causal Graphs which Account for Observational Support

Accident causation models: A comparison of SCM and 24Model

Causal Discovery via Causal Star Graphs