Abstract:Pollution havens create environmental inequality issues. China's recent policy of directing high-pollution firms to migrate out of its capital, Beijing, offers a case of a pollution haven that was mandated, rather than resulting from firms' responses to environmental regulation. More importantly, it leads to a question that has been less discussed in previous literature: does a pollution haven strike back? After the highly polluting enterprises moved out of Beijing to neighboring Hebei province, Hebei has been blamed for the continuing poor air quality in Beijing, based on a perception that the pollutants emitted in Hebei are being blown back to Beijing. This paper investigates the existence of a pollution haven in Hebei and quantifies the contribution of Hebei's emissions to Beijing's air quality. We find that the proportion of output values and the relative concentration of high-pollution industries in Hebei increased when the large-scale out-migration began, while the indicators in Beijing decreased. We also find higher emissions of enterprises in Hebei than their counterparts in Beijing. Together, these findings indicate the existence of a "manmade" pollution haven. Further, based on high-frequency spatial data, we combine an Autoregressive Distributed Lag model and a Spatial Autoregressive Model and decompose the factors that affect Beijing's air quality into local and regional transport of air-borne pollutants. We find a significant effect of the neighboring cities' air pollution on Beijing's air quality. This indicates that the pollution haven indeed struck back. These findings imply the importance of regional policies to control air pollution.

Waste Import and Air Pollution: Evidence from China's Waste Import Ban

The Pollution Haven Strikes Back?–evidence from Air Quality Daily Variation in the Jing-Jin-Ji Region of China

WTO Accession, Trade Expansion, and Air Pollution: Evidence from China's County‐Level Panel Data

Foreign waste ban and green development of Chinese manufacturing industry: Comprehensive evidence based on provincial data

Impact of China's National Sword Policy on Waste Import Margins: A Difference-in-Differences Approach

A better environment at the expense of export growth: A supply‐chain linkage perspective

The impact of the policy of municipal solid waste source-separated collection on waste reduction: a case study of China

Environmental Regulation and Exports: Evidence from the Comprehensive Air Pollution Policy in China

Impact of China's waste import policy on the scrap copper recovery pattern and environmental benefits

Centralization of Environmental Administration and Air Pollution: Evidence from China

Implications of China’s foreign waste ban on the global circular economy

Comparative analysis of the contribution of municipal waste management policies to GHG reductions in China

China's Plastic Import Ban Increases Prospects of Environmental Impact Mitigation of Plastic Waste Trade Flow Worldwide.

The impacts of heterogeneous traffic regulation on air pollution: Evidence from China

Health Benefits from Improved Air Quality: Evidence from Pollution Regulations in China’s “$$2{+}26$$” Cities

Spillover Effects of Household Waste Separation Policy on Electricity Consumption: Evidence from Hangzhou, China

Pollution acceleration before braking: Evidence of environmental deterioration from anticipated environmental regulations in China

Economic Impact of More Stringent Environmental Standard in China: Evidence from a Regional Policy Experimentation in Pulp and Paper Industry

Clean Heating and Clean Air: Evidence from the Coal-to-gas Program in China

Informal Environment Regulation, Green Technology Innovation and Air Pollution: Quasi-Natural Experiments from Prefectural Cities in China

Impacts of environmental regulation and innovation-driven upgrading on carbon emission: Evidence from China