Biobased propylene and acrylonitrile production in a sugarcane biorefinery: Identification of preferred production routes via techno-economic and environmental assessments

Lukhanyo Rode,Catharine Elizabeth Bosman,Jeanne Louw,Abdul Petersen,Nosaibeh Nosrati Ghods,Johann Ferdinand Görgens

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107399

IF: 5.774

2024-09-30

Biomass and Bioenergy

Abstract:Four alternative, sugar-derived chemical intermediates were compared for the production of propylene and acrylonitrile in energy self-sufficient biorefineries, annexed to an existing sugarcane mill, to assess economic feasibility and environmental sustainability. Aspen Plus® process simulations considered ethanol and isopropanol produced from A-molasses as intermediates for propylene production, while propylene and 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) from A-molasses were compared for acrylonitrile production. The minimum selling prices (MSPs) for propylene-from-ethanol (3634 /t), acrylonitrile-from-propylene (4698 /t) were 280 %, 752 %, 302 % and 409 % above the market prices of fossil-based equivalents. Nonetheless, the propylene biorefineries achieved up to 97 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, whilst acrylonitrile biorefineries had up to 43 % reduction compared to fossil-based production processes. Based on process yields, energy demand and GHG emissions, ethanol was identified as the preferred intermediate route for all four biorefinery scenarios, while substantial price-premiums will be required for industrial production.

energy & fuels,biotechnology & applied microbiology,agricultural engineering