Abstract:Shore power (SP) can provide electricity from the land for ships instead of from ship engines; this approach can eradicate carbon emissions and foster green port development. However, due to the high SP installation cost and high electricity prices faced by shipping operators, the utilization rate of SP is still low. For the government, it is important and urgent to develop an effective policy to promote shore power usage. However, previous studies have not compared the effects of different government policies and have ignored the differences in SP usage stages. Therefore, in this study, three kinds of policies, subsidy, carbon tax and shipper green awareness improvement, are taken into consideration. The SP usage process is divided into two stages, namely, stimulating ship retrofitting for SP in the short term and sustaining SP usage in the long run. The purpose of this study is to provide policy-selection suggestions for short- and long-term SP promotion. Considering shipping supply chain competition, game theory is applied, and a series of Nash game models are formulated to investigate the equilibrium strategies of shipping operators on SP usage under different policies. A comparison of the results reveals that in the short run, the subsidy policy is superior to the carbon tax policy when both can promote SP usage. However, a moderate carbon tax is able to remedy the failure of subsidies. In the long run, a carbon tax may promote SP at the cost of diminishing social welfare. Improving shipper green awareness is more likely to be a preferable choice for both SP usage and social welfare. This paper also analyses the impacts of scale-based port congestion and green awareness. These findings can provide valuable suggestions for government and shipping operators to promote SP usage, reduce emissions and achieve the goal of green port construction.

Shore Side Electricity Subsidy Policy Efficiency Optimization: from the Game Theory Perspective

Incentive Policy for Reduction of Emission from Ships: A Case Study of China

Shore Power Management for Green Shipping under International River Transportation

Using System Dynamics and Game Model to Estimate Optimal Subsidy in Shore Power Technology

Subsidy policy selection for shore power promotion: Subsidizing facility investment or price of shore power?

Implications of Government Subsidies on Shipping Companies’ Shore Power Usage Strategies in Port

Shore Power Price Competition Between Ports

An environmental and techno-economic analysis of shore side electricity

Shore Power Deployment Problem—A Case Study of a Chinese Container Shipping Network

Enhancing Inland River Shore Power Utilization: A Game Theory and Prospect Theory Approach to Optimizing Incentive Mechanisms

Study on Emission Control of Berthing Vessels-Based on Non-Cooperative Game Theory

Capacity Investment of Shore Power Berths for a Container Port: Environmental Incentive and Infrastructure Subsidy Policies

Subsidy, tax or green awareness: Government policy selection for promoting initial shore power usage and sustaining long-run use

Subsidy policy optimization of multimodal transport on emission reduction considering carrier pricing game and shipping resilience: A case study of Shanghai port

A life cycle cost analysis of different shore power incentive policies on both shore and ship sides based on system dynamics and a Chinese port case

Optimal Pricing and Scheduling of Seaport-Ships Coordination System: A Game Theoretic Approach

Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of multiple stakeholders under the process of shore power promotion

Cost-effective Optimization Analysis of Shore-to-ship Power System Construction and Operation

The Emission Reduction Technology Decision of the Port Supply Chain

Comprehensive Benefit Analysis of Port Shore Power Based on Carbon Trading

An Analysis of the Impact of Government Subsidies on Emission Reduction Technology Investment Strategies in Low-Carbon Port Operations