Abstract:In response to the comments made by Lu et al., titled "Imported COVID-19 cases: a hot topic with a lack of a clear definition", we would like to give the following reply, hoping to resolve the confusion. First, regarding the statement in our article, "according to whether the patient had a travel or residence history in other regions within 14 days before diagnosis and likely exposure to pathogens in those regions, patients were divided into imported and local cases", the word 'regions' here refers to provinces other than this province, such as Hubei Province. Although the definition of imported cases used internationally mostly refers to cases imported from abroad, from the perspective of epidemiology, an imported case means that the patient was infected non-locally and imported the disease into the local area. This covers a wider range of importations, not only including cases imported from abroad. Moreover, there were no imported cases from foreign countries in the early stage of the epidemic. Therefore, to distinguish between local cases and imported cases, this definition was adopted in our study. Second, such imported cases corresponded to locally infected cases. It was difficult to avoid the flow of cases in the early stage of the epidemic (also during the Chinese New Year), especially before interventions had been introduced. We must distinguish whether the case came from another region or whether the infection occurred locally. Furthermore, it is useful to explore their epidemiological characteristics. Third, the end date of our study was March 2, and China began to report imported cases from foreign countries on March 4. Therefore, imported cases mentioned in our article are not imported cases from abroad. This will not cause readers to misunderstand that imported cases are imported cases from abroad. There are also many other studies that have used the term 'imported cases' to express the same meaning, especially in the early stage of the epidemic in China (Kwok et al., 2020Kwok K.O. Wong V.W.Y. Wei W.I. Wong S.Y.S. Tang J.W. Epidemiological characteristics of the first 53 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 epidemic in Hong Kong, 13 February 2020.Euro Surveill. 2020; 252000155https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.16.2000155Crossref Scopus (43) Google Scholar, Lai et al., 2020Lai C.K.C. Ng R.W.Y. Wong M.C.S. Chong K.C. Yeoh Y.K. Chen Z. et al.Epidemiological characteristics of the first 100 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, a city with a stringent containment policy.Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 49: 1096-1105https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa106Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar, Tian et al., 2020Tian S. Hu N. Lou J. Chen K. Kang X. Xiang Z. et al.Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing.J Infect. 2020; 80: 401-406https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (751) Google Scholar, Yang et al., 2020Yang S. Shi Y. Lu H. Xu J. Li F. Qian Z. et al.Clinical and CT features of early stage patients with COVID-19: a retrospective analysis of imported cases in Shanghai, China.Eur Respir J. 2020; 55 (2000407)https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00407-2020Crossref Scopus (38) Google Scholar). Finally, in the pandemic, imported cases from abroad have become the focus of China's epidemic prevention and control, and the definition of imported cases in the literature has also changed, mainly referring to cases imported from abroad. Therefore, we also believe that it is necessary to clearly define in all studies whether the cases are imported from a foreign country or imported from an outside province or city. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82041023) and Zhejiang University Special Scientific Research Fund for COVID-19 Prevention and Control (grant number 2020XGZX016).

Confusion about the Definition of Imported Cases in the Early Stage of the Epidemic