Comprehensive Bioinformatical Analysis Identifies Heterogeneity of Genomics and Tumor Microenvironment Between Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

C. Cao,L. Yin,Y. Lu,J. Chen,H. Yuan,W. Gao,J. Wu,Y. Miao,Z. Lu,K. Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2022.05.616
IF: 3.842
2022-01-01
HPB
Abstract:Introduction: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreatic malignancies which presents different biological and clinical features with classic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, no comprehensive comparative analysis of genomics and tumor microenvironment (TME) between PASCs and PDACs has been reported. This study is to determine genomic and TME difference between PASCs and PDACs via bioinformatical approach. Method: RNA-seq, mutation and clinical data of ICGC (International Cancer Genome Consortium) cohort were downloaded and collected from CBioPortal website. R package maftools and GenVisR were applied to analyze mutated genes and Deseq2 was used to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and protein-protein interaction (PPI)analysis were also performed. Online tools ESTIMATE, MCPcounter and CIBERSORT were used to determine the stromal and immune scores of transcriptome datasets. Results: SMAD4 mutation rate was significantly lower in PASCs (0/12, 0%) than PDACs (19/70, 27.1%) while CC2D2A mutation was prevalent in PASCs (2/7, 16.67%) with none in PDACs (0/70, 0%). 869 significant DEGs(log2 Fold Change>2, false discovery rate (FDR)<0.05) were identified, including 583 down-regulated genes and 286 up-regulated genes in PASCs. DEGs were enriched in pathway of maturity onset of diabetes of the young, GO terms of epidermis development, cornification and skin development. TME analysis showed that the proportions of resting and activated NK cells, and neutrophils were significantly higher in PDACs than PASCs. Conclusions: There are genomic and TME differences between PASCs and PDACs which can possibly contribute to the clinical differences.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?