The Different Evaluative Significance of Enlarged Lymph Nodes on Preoperative CT in the N Stage for Patients with Suspected Subsolid and Solid Lung Cancers.

Bin Wang,Ke Sun,Xue Meng,Maheshkumar Satishkumar Bhuva,Xiwen Sun,Yangyang Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.08.029
IF: 5.482
2023-01-01
Academic Radiology
Abstract:Rationale and Objectives: To investigate the clinical value of enlarged mediastinal and/or hilar lymph nodes on CT for patients with lung subsolid and solid nodules.Materials and Methods: The study was performed on patients who underwent surgical treatment for suspected lung cancer. One hun-dred seventeen subsolid nodules and 101 solid nodules with enlarged lymph nodes (LNs) were included in the study group. The same number of cases with normal LNs with a balanced distribution of the clinical T stage were randomly selected as the control group for each study group. The pathological statuses of the lymph nodes of these patients proven by histopathology after surgery were collected. Results: Lung solid lesions with enlarged LNs were more prone to lymph node metastasis (37.6% vs. 13.9%, p <0.001). However, there were only two and one metastatic lesions in the subsolid group with and without enlarged LNs, respectively. (2/117 vs. 1/117, p = 1.000). No pathological lymph node metastasis was observed in subsolid lesions under clinical stage T1b (cT1b), even though some of them (117/234) with enlarged LNs.Conclusion: The evaluative significance of enlarged LNs on CT is different for subsolid and solid lesions. CT is useful for lymph node eval-uation and N staging of solid lesions but may has little value for subsolid lesions. There is a very low possibility of lymph node metastasis occurring in patients with subsolid lesions under cT1b. Enlarged LNs on CT may not be critical in subsequent management and treatment for subsolid nodules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?