Lewis Number Effects on Laminar and Turbulent Expanding Flames of NH3/H2/air Mixtures at Elevated Pressures

Hongchao Dai,Jinhua Wang,Xiao Cai,Shouguo Su,Haoran Zhao,Zuohua Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2022.07.200
IF: 6.535
2023-01-01
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Abstract:This study clarifies the effects of Lewis number (Le) on laminar and turbulent expanding flames of NH3/H2/air mixtures. The laminar burning velocity (SL) and turbulent burning velocity (ST) were measured using a medium-scale, fan-stirred combustion chamber with ammonia/hydrogen molar ratio (NH3/H2) of 50/50 and 80/20 under the maximum pressures of 5 atm. The lean laminar flame with NH3/H2 = 50/50 is significantly accelerated by the diffusional–thermal instability, which dominated the trend of ST,c=0.1 with the equivalence ratio (ϕ). The lean normalized turbulent burning velocity (ST/SL) increases with the decrease of hydrogen content due to the weakening effects of SL. However, the ST/SL reaches peak with hydrogen volumetric content less than 20% due to effects made by diffusional–thermal instability than SL did. The turbulent flame of NH3/H2/air mixtures is characterized by self-similar acceleration propagation, and propagation with Le < 1 is faster. A modified correlation considering the effects of Le was proposed, as (d/dt)/σSL = 0.118(ReT,flameLe−2)0.57, which was able to predict not only the self-similar propagation of NH3/H2/air but also the previous syngas/air flames. The Kobayashi correlations modified by three kinds of Le power exponents were used to clarify the effects of Le by comparing their fitting parameters and predictive powers on experimental data and literature data. Similar pre-factors, power exponents and the goodness of fit (R2) were obtained with Le ranging from 0.58 to 1.62, which suggested that the determination of Le power exponent had no significant effect on the prediction accuracy of the ST/SL trend with data of Le near unity. This might be attributed to the fact that the variation ranges of the dimensionless number that characterizes the experimental conditions is much larger than that of the Le.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?