Abstract:PURPOSE: Despite the high clinical accuracy of dynamic navigation, inherent sources of error exist. The purpose of this study was to improve the accuracy of dynamic navigated surgical procedures in the edentulous maxilla by identifying the optimal configuration of intra-oral points that results in the lowest possible registration error for direct clinical implementation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six different 4-area configurations were tested by 3 operators against positive and negative controls (8-areas and 3-areas, respectively) using a skull model. The two dynamic navigation systems (X-Guide® and NaviDent®) and the two registration methods (bone surface tracing and fiducial markers) produced four registration groups. The accuracy of the registration was checked at the frontal process of the zygoma. Intra- and inter- operator reliability for each registration group were reported. Multiple comparisons were conducted to find the best configuration with the minimum registration error.RESULTS: Ranking revealed one configuration in the tracing groups (Conf.3) and two configurations in the fiducial groups (Conf.3 and Conf.5) that had the best accuracy. When the inferior surfaces of the zygomatic buttress were excluded, fiducial registration produced better accuracy with both systems (p 0.006 and <0.0001). However, tracing 1 cm areas at these surfaces bilaterally resulted in similar registration accuracy as placing fiducial markers there (p 0.430 and 0.237). NaviDent® performed generally better (p 0.049, 0.001 and 0.002) albeit having a wider margin of uncertainty in the obtained values. Changing the distribution of the 4 tracing areas or fiducial markers had a less pronounced effect with X-Guide® than with the NaviDent® system.CONCLUSION: For edentulous maxillary surgeries, 4 fiducial markers placed according to configuration 3 or 5 result in the lowest registration error. Where implants are being placed bilaterally, an additional 2 sites may reduce the error further. For bilateral zygomatic implant placement, it is optimal to place 2 fiducials on the inferior surfaces of the maxillary tuberosities, other 2 on their buccal surfaces, and 2 on the anterior labial surface of the alveolar bone. Utilising the inferior zygomatic buttress is recommended over the inferior maxillary tuberosities in other types of maxillary surgeries.

A Registration-and-fixation Approach with Handpiece Adjustment for Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery.

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of Different Registration Areas Using Active and Passive Dynamic Navigation Systems in Dental Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study.

Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Different Dynamic Navigation System Registration Methods for Dental Implant Placement in the Posterior Area: an in Vitro Study.

Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years

The Accuracy of Intraoral Registration for Dynamic Surgical Navigation in the Edentulous Maxilla

Accuracy and Efficiency of a Calibration Approach in Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement: an in Vitro Study

The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study

Accuracy of Automatic and Manual Dynamic Navigation Registration Techniques for Dental Implant Surgery in Posterior Sites Missing a Single Tooth: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis.

Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study

The impacts of registration‐and‐fixation device positioning on the performance of implant placement assisted by dynamic computer‐aided surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Computer-assisted preoperative planning system with an automated registration method in prosthesis-driven oral implantology

Accuracy and patient-centered results of marker-based and marker-free registrations for dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Proposal and Validation of a New Nonradiological Method for Postoperative Three-Dimensional Implant Position Analysis Based on the Dynamic Navigation System: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study

Accuracy of 3 Calibration Methods of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial

The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series

Intraoral Scanning Enables Virtual-Splint-Based Non-Invasive Registration Protocol for Maxillofacial Surgical Navigation

Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation with Accurate CBCT-patient Registration for Dental Implant Placement

A Comparative Prospective Study on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Autonomous Robotic System Versus Dynamic Navigation System in Dental Implant Placement