Abstract:It is debated whether sub-second timing is subserved by a centralized mechanism or by the intrinsic properties of task-related neural activity in specific modalities (Ivry and Schlerf, 2008). By using a temporal adaptation task, we investigated whether adapting to different time intervals conveyed through stimuli in different modalities (i.e., frames of a visual Ternus display, visual blinking discs, or auditory beeps) would affect the subsequent implicit perception of visual timing, i.e., inter-stimulus interval (ISI) between two frames in a Ternus display. The Ternus display can induce two percepts of apparent motion (AM), depending on the ISI between the two frames: "element motion" for short ISIs, in which the endmost disc is seen as moving back and forth while the middle disc at the overlapping or central position remains stationary; "group motion" for longer ISIs, in which both discs appear to move in a manner of lateral displacement as a whole. In Experiment 1, participants adapted to either the typical "element motion" (ISI = 50 ms) or the typical "group motion" (ISI = 200 ms). In Experiments 2 and 3, participants adapted to a time interval of 50 or 200 ms through observing a series of two paired blinking discs at the center of the screen (Experiment 2) or hearing a sequence of two paired beeps (with pitch 1000 Hz). In Experiment 4, participants adapted to sequences of paired beeps with either low pitches (500 Hz) or high pitches (5000 Hz). After adaptation in each trial, participants were presented with a Ternus probe in which the ISI between the two frames was equal to the transitional threshold of the two types of motions, as determined by a pretest. Results showed that adapting to the short time interval in all the situations led to more reports of "group motion" in the subsequent Ternus probes; adapting to the long time interval, however, caused no aftereffect for visual adaptation but significantly more reports of group motion for auditory adaptation. These findings, suggesting amodal representation for sub-second timing across modalities, are interpreted in the framework of temporal pacemaker model.

Holistic Temporal Order Judgment of Tones Requires Top‐down Disentanglement

Temporal Order Perception of Auditory Stimuli is Selectively Modified by Tonal and Non-Tonal Language Environments

Temporal Configuration as a New Feature of Sound: Psychological and Neurophysiological Evidence, Cross-species Consistency and Underlying Neuronal Mechanisms

Visual Simultaneity Judgments Activate a Bilateral Frontoparietal Timing System

Auditory Perception of Temporal Order: A Comparison Between Tonal Language Speakers with and Without Non-Tonal Language Experience

Sub- and Supra-Second Timing in Auditory Perception: Evidence for Cross-Domain Relationships

Splitting time: Sound-induced illusory visual temporal fission and fusion.

Adaptation to Visual or Auditory Time Intervals Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion

A Supramodal and Conceptual Representation of Subsecond Time Revealed with Perceptual Learning of Temporal Interval Discrimination.

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Temporal Order Perception

Temporal context modulates cross-modality time discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for supramodal temporal representation

Situational Context is Important: Perceptual Grouping Modulates Temporal Perception

Audiovisual temporal recalibration: space-based versus context-based

Research Methods of Temporal Order Perception and Influencing Factors

Multiple Concurrent Temporal Recalibrations Driven by Audiovisual Stimuli with Apparent Physical Differences

The recalibration patterns of perceptual synchrony and multisensory integration after exposure to asynchronous speech.

Mindfulness Meditation Biases Visual Temporal Order Discrimination but Not under Conditions of Temporal Ventriloquism

What You See Depends on What You Hear: Temporal Averaging and Crossmodal Integration

The Role of Spatiotemporal and Spectral Cues in Segregating Short Sound Events: Evidence from Auditory Ternus Display

Perceptual learning evidence for an interval- and modality-invariant representation of subsecond time

Adaptation to Temporal Interval Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion