Abstract:A long standing view in the political economy of bureaucracy holds that the quality of political governance is the foundation of high quality development agencies. However, the existing literature does not provide an adequate account of how political leadership shape the capacity of development agencies. Motivated by the discrepancy between formal political institutions and large within country variation of bureaucratic governance in reality, this paper argues that the governing structure and capacity of development agencies crucially depend on the interaction between formal institutional constraints entrenched in the political system and the strength of political leadership. Specifically, neither institutional constraints nor strong leadership alone guarantees a sufficient degree of bureaucratic autonomy for development agencies. Without strong leadership, institutional checks and balance may give rise to excessive veto points in policy making and underminebureaucratic autonomy. Without proper institutional checks and balance, development agencies’ autonomy and capacity tend to compromised by the moral hazard of strong leadership. In turn, our theoretical argument predicts that development agencies exhibit strong autonomy and capacity with the presence of both strong leadership and institutional constraints. We use a crosscountry dataset of national development banks to test the theory. The regression results and case studies of national development banks are consistent with the theory.This Research Paper is published in the framework of the International Research Initiative on Public Development Banks working groups and released for the occasion of the 14th AFD International Research Conference on Development. It is part of the pilot research program “Realizing the Potential of Public Development Banks for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals”. This program was launched, along with the International Research Initiative on Public Development Banks (PDBs), by the Institute of New Structural Economics (INSE) at Peking University, and sponsored by the Agence francaise de developpement (AFD), Ford Foundation and International Development Finance Club (IDFC). Have a look on the key findings for a quick overview of the research resultsSee the video pitch

The Maturity‐lengthening Role of National Development Banks

Long-term Finance Provision: National Development Banks Vs Commercial Banks

National Development Banks and Loan Contract Terms: Evidence from Syndicated Loans

A Theory of National Development Bank: Long-Term Investment and the Agency Problem

Implicit Government Guarantee and Corporate Investment: Evidence from China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Capitalizing Development

Not All Bonds Are Created Equal-As Benchmarks for Corporate Bonds

The Role of National Development Banks on Economic Growth: BNDES Case

The Long-Term Use of Short-Term Debt Around the World

State Actors, Market Games: Credit Guarantees and the Funding of China Development Bank

Maturity Mismatches of Chinese Listed Firms

Debt for Growth?

Borrowing Country-Oriented or Donor Country-Oriented? Comparing the BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

The Impact of Non-Interest Business Development on the Performance of Chinese Rural Commercial Banks

Bank Loans with Chinese Characteristics: Some Evidence on Inside Debt in A State-Controlled Banking System

On support from National Development Banks for the internationalisation of public Brazilian companies: it's hard to say goodbye (to good companies)

Checks and balance, Political Leadership, and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Evidence from National Development Banks

Does the market accept the perpetual bonds issued by commercial banks? Evidence from China

The Effect of Bank Monitoring on Public Bond Terms

Beyond Donation: China's Policy Banks and the Reshaping of Development Finance

New Development Bank's role in the global financial architecture